Cleansing Fire

Defending Truth and Tradition in the Lay-Run Roman Catholic Diocese of Rochester

Posts Tagged ‘Liturgical art’

Icons of the Great Feasts: The Ascension

May 17th, 2012, Promulgated by Bernie
This entry is part 7 of 10 in the series Great Feasts

Previously here

We continue our series of looking at the icons of the Great Feasts of the Eastern Rite Catholic and Orthodox Churches.

The angel Gabriel was at the beginning, at the Incarnation, when God took flesh of the Virgin Mary and became man. Angels filled the sky to announce His birth to shepherds. God humbled Himself and descended to earth and became flesh.

When the Lord ascended back to His Father at the end of His earthly mission, He took with Him His human body, now glorified.  Redemption was complete and, just like at the beginning, angels were present.

At the Incarnation the Lord -Divinity- descended into human flesh; in the Ascension He takes His flesh back to the Father. Like Jesus, we too will ascend to the Father, our flesh glorified.

“The Ascension of Christ is our elevation, and whither the glory of the Head has preceded by anticipation, the hope of the body too is called.”1

In the icon of the Ascension, Christ ascends to heaven in a round shape of glory, a mandorla or full body halo reserved for manifestations of divinity. The mandorla is by definition almond shaped but circular and star ones are not uncommon.  Flanking the mandorla are angels. They might be interpreted by some people as powering the mandorla  upward but, in fact, they extend their arms in praise, for Christ ascends of His own power and not by the aid of anyone or anything else. Other angels trumpet the return of the Son to Heaven.

“Today the hosts on high, beholding our nature in the heavens, marvel at the strange manner of its ascent, and, being perplexed, they said one to another: Who is this that comes? And when they saw that it was they Master, they commanded to lift up the heavenly gates. With them we ceaselessly praise you, who again shall come from thence in the flesh, as the Judge of all and Almighty God”2

In traditional iconography of the Ascension, the mandorla consists of concentric circles of blue tones that gradate from a dark center to a lighter perimeter. Often, golden streaks of light radiate out from the figure of Christ who is shown either in white or orange robes, the colors of Christ’s divinity in icons that manifest His glory. He blesses with His right hand and holds a scroll in His left, a symbol of the gospel that the apostles are charged with taking to the ends of the earth.

In the center of the icon at the bottom among the grouping of the apostles is Mary, the Mother of God. According to Tradition Mary was present at the Ascension although sacred scripture is silent about her being there. Likewise, St. Paul (on the right) is depicted as being present  but he, of course, could not have been there as he was not as yet converted to Christ. Whenever something appears in an icon that is not mentioned in scripture we look for a doctrinal explanation. Here, it is the doctrine of the Mystical Body of Christ.

Mary’s figure is placed in the composition directly beneath the enthroned figure of Christ who is head of the Church. Mary and the original apostles and St. Paul, a later convert, form the core from which the Church will develop. Mary is the embodiment of the Church; personifying the body of the Church. She stands in the orans position of prayer, the symbol of the whole Church praying and seeking intercession with Christ, the Head.  In some icons she is depicted in the traditional martyr’s pose with hands in front of her breasts and palms facing forward. In still others, she has one hand raised with the palm facing forward and the other extended as if presenting the apostles, Church. Mary’s calm and confident stillness expresses the immutability of the revealed truth entrusted to the Church.3 The –often- more animated apostles suggest a variety of languages and means for expressing the truth.

"Last Judgment", (detail) tympanum, Church of St. Foy, Conques, France, 1107

 

Two angels stand among the apostles and caution them that as Christ ascended so He will return at the end of time. This eschatological aspect of the icon and the Gospel message leaves us with the hopeful expectation of the Second Coming. In fact, in icons of the Last Judgment Christ is depicted as arriving in the same mandorla type shape, accompanied by angels.

……………………………………………………………………………………..

Footnotes

1 Saint Leo the Great, Discourse 73. First text on the Ascension. P.L. 54, col. 396

2 The Ascension, Matins of the Eastern Rite

3 Solrunn Nes, The Mystical Language of Icons, (Grand Rapids, Eerdmans Publishing, 2004), p. 87

Picture Sources

Featured Icon (top):  http://philoski.blogspot.com/2010/07/icons-liv.html

Book Recommendations and Research Sources

Solrunn Nes, The Mystical Language of Icons, (Grand Rapids, Eerdmans Publishing, 2004)

Leonid Ouspensky & Vladimir Lossky, The Meaning of Icons, (Crestwood, St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1994)

Blocking the Windows; Smearing the Glass

May 11th, 2012, Promulgated by Bernie

1.

A recent series on the New Liturgical Movement website caused me to revisit a little book by Russian philosopher, scientist, art historian, and theologian Pavel Florsnsky called, Iconostasis. While browsing through the pages, my eyes landed on a couple of paragraphs that seem to me to speak to the reasons why we need an abundance of imagery in our Catholic churches.

… once we open our spiritual eyes and raise them to the Throne of God, we contemplate heavenly visions: the cloud that covers the top of Mount Sinai, the cloud wherein the mystery of God’s presence is revealed by that which clouds it. This cloud is (in the Apostle’s phrase) “a cloud of witnesses” (Heb. 12:1), it is the saints. They surround the altar, and they are the “living stones” that make up the living wall of the iconostasis for they dwell simultaneously in two worlds, combining within themselves the life here and the life there. And their upraised gaze bears witness to the operation of God’s mystery, for their holy countenances in themselves bear witness to the symbolic reality of their spiritual sight–and, in them, the empirical crust is completely pierced by light from above.

… The iconostasis is a boundary between the visible and invisible worlds, and it functions as a boundary by being an obstacle to our seeing the altar, thereby making it accessible to

2.

our consciousness by means of its unified row of saints (i.e., by its cloud of witnesses) that surround the altar where God is, the sphere where heavenly glory dwells, thus proclaiming the Mystery. Iconostasis is vision. Iconostasis is a manifestation of saints and angels–angelophania–a manifest appearance of heavenly witnesses that includes, first of all, the Mother of God and Christ himself in the flesh, witnesses who proclaim that which is from the other side of mortal flesh. Iconostasis is the saints themselves. If everyone praying in a temple (church) were wholly spiritualized, if everyone praying were truly to see, then there would be no iconostasis other than standing before God Himself, witnessing to him by their holy countenances and proclaiming his terrifying glory by their sacred words.

But because our sight is weak and our prayers are feeble, the Church, in Her care for us, gave us a visual strength for our spiritual brokenness: the heavenly visions on the iconostasis, vivid, precise, and illumined, that articulate, materially cohere, an image into fixed colors. But this spiritual prop, this material iconostasis, does not conceal from the believer (as someone in ignorant self-absorption might imagine) some sharp mystery; on the contrary, the iconostasis points out to the half-blind the Mysteries of the altar, opens for them an entrance into a world closed to them by their own stuckness, cries into their deaf ears the voice of the Heavenly Kingdom, a voice made deafening to them by their having failed to take in the speech of ordinary voices. This heavenly cry is therefore stripped, of course, of all the subtly rich expressiveness of ordinary speech: but who commits the act of such stripping when it is we who fail to appreciate the heavenly cry because we failed first to recognize it in ordinary speech: what can be left except a deafening cry?

 

3.

 

Destroy the material iconostasis and the altar itself will, as such, wholly vanish from our consciousness as if covered over by an essentially impenetrable wall. But the material iconostasis does not, in itself, take the place of the living witnesses, existing instead of them; rather, it points toward them, concentrating the attention of those who pray upon them–a concentration of attention that is essential to the developing of spiritual sight. To speak figuratively, then, a temple without a material iconostasis erects a solid wall between altar and temple; the iconostasis opens windows in this wall, through whose glass we see (those of us who can see) what is permanently occurring beyond: the living witnesses to God. To destroy icons thus means to bock up the windows; it means smearing the glass and weakening the spiritual light for those of us who otherwise could see it directly, who could (you could figuratively say) behold it in a transparent space free of earthly air, a space where we could learn to breathe the pure ethereal air and to live in the light of God’s glory: and when this happens, the material iconostasis will self-destruct in that vast obliteration which will destroy the whole image of this world–and which will even destroy faith and hope–and then we will contemplate, in pure love, the immortal glory of God.

______________________________

Florsnsky, Pavel, Iconostasis, trans. by Donald Sheehan and Olga Andrejev, (Creastwood, St. Vladinir’s Seminary Press, 1996); “Orthodox Services and the Icon” pp. 61-63

Credits:

1. http://fatherstephen.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/the-iconostasis/

2. http://godschool.blog.co.uk/2010/12/22/snowy-romanian-christmas-10236368/

3. Bernie

Saint Andrew Church in Old Pasadena, California

April 24th, 2012, Promulgated by Bernie

(click on photos for sharper images)

I have always been much impressed with the logical Greek and Roman arrangement of architectural space in the earliest Christian basilica churches. The basilica arrangement just seems to be a perfect fit for Christian theology. I don’t mean to imply that Romanesque, Gothic, and Baroque spaces don’t work well. It is just that the ancient basilica arrangement is just so complete and clear. Indeed, the other styles are modifications of the ancient basilica plan. Churches never seem to work well when they stray too far from the basilica plan.

In researching something else, as so often happens, I came across a church and parish in Old Pasadena, California that is beautiful in its imitation of the ancient basilica churches. Saint Andrew Church is stunning and could almost pass as an original fifth to the sixth century basilica. Even the mosaics come very close and the open timbered ceiling… well, I could almost be in Rome.

Nearly an exact copy of the ciborium/baldachin of the "Basilica Saint Lawrence Outside the Walls", Rome, Italy.

This looks a little like "Santa Maria in Cosmedin" in Rome, Italy.

 

Icon of the Sunday of the Holy Myrrhbearers

April 15th, 2012, Promulgated by Bernie

Previously in our series of the icons of the Great Feasts of the Eastern Church

(Click on the picture to see a larger image)

The Holy Myrrhbearers
by the hand of Matthew D. Garrett

Apolytikia

Unto the myrrh-bearing women did the Angel cry out as he stood by the grave: Myrrh-oils are meet for the dead, but Christ has proved to be a stranger to corruption. But cry out: The Lord is risen, granting great mercy to the world.

Kontakion

When You did cry, Rejoice, unto the Myrrhbearers, You did make the lamentation of Eve the first mother to cease by Your Resurrection, O Christ God. And You did bid Your Apsotles to preach: The Savior is risen from the grave.

The second Sunday after the Feast of Holy Pascha (Easter Sunday) is observed by the Byzantine Catholic, and Orthodox Churches, as the Sunday of the Holy Myrrhbearers. The day commemorates when the women disciples of our Lord came to the tomb to anoint his body with myrrh-oils but found the tomb empty. As the woman wondered what this meant, angels appeared proclaiming that Christ had risen from the dead.

“When the sabbath was over, Mary Magdalene, Mary, the mother of James, and Salome bought spices so that they might go and anoint him. Very early when the sun had risen, on the first day of the week, they came to the tomb. They were saying to one another, “Who will roll back the stone for us from the entrance to the tomb?

“When they looked up, they saw that the stone had been rolled back; it was very large.

“On entering the tomb they saw a young man sitting on the right side, clothed in a white robe, and they were utterly amazed. He said to them, “Do not be amazed! You seek Jesus of Nazareth, the crucified. He has been raised; he is not here. Behold the place where they laid him. But go and tell his disciples and Peter, ‘He is going before you to Galilee; there you will see him, as he told you.’”

The icon of this feast is the ‘other’ traditional icon that celebrates the greatest of all feasts, Pascha/Easter. The other is the Descent into Hell. The icon of the Sunday of the Holy Myrrhbearers depicts the biblical story of the women arriving at the tomb to anoint the body of Christ. The angel is seated upon the stone that covered the tomb, and he is pointing to the empty garments showing that Christ has risen from the dead.

The following is a reading selection from Holy Transfiguration Monastery of Brookline, MA:

“About the beginning of His thirty-second year, when the Lord Jesus was going throughout Galilee, preaching and working miracles, many women who had received of His beneficence left their own homeland and from then on followed after Him. They ministered unto Him out of their own possessions, even until His crucifixion and entombment; and afterwards, neither losing faith in Him after His death, nor fearing the wrath of the Jewish rulers, they came to His sepulcher, bearing the myrrh-oils they had prepared to anoint His body. It is because of the myrrh-oils that these God-loving women brought to the tomb of Jesus that they are called Myrrh-bearers.

“Of those whose names are known are the following: first of all, the most holy Virgin Mary, who in Matthew 27:56 and Mark 15:40 is called “the mother of James and Joses” (these are the sons of Joseph by a previous marriage, and she was therefore their step-mother); Mary Magdalene (celebrated July 22); Mary, the wife of Clopas; Joanna, wife of Chouza, a steward of Herod Antipas; Salome, the mother of the sons of Zebedee; Mary and Martha, the sisters of Lazarus; and Susanna. As for the names of the rest of them, the evangelists have kept silence (Matthew 217:55-56; 28:1-10. Mark 15:40-41.

“Luke 8:1-3; 23:55-24:11, 22-24. John 19:25; 20:11-18. Acts 1:14.) Together with them we celebrate also the secret disciples of the Savior, Joseph and Nicodemus. Of these, Nicodemus was probably a Jerusalemite, a prominent leader among the Jews and of the order of the Pharisees, learned in the Law and instructed in the Holy Scriptures. He had believed in Christ when, at the beginning of our Savior’s preaching of salvation, he came to Him by night. Furthermore, he brought some one hundred pounds of myrrh-oils and an aromatic mixture of aloes and spices out of reverence for the divine Teacher (John 19:39). Joseph, who was from the city of Arimathea, was a wealthy and noble man, and one of the counselors who were in Jerusalem. He went bodly unto Pilate and asked for the body of Jesus, and together with Nicodemus he gave Him burial. Since time did not permit the preparation of another tomb, he placed the Lord’s body in his own tomb which was hewn out of rock, as the Evangelist says (Matthew 27:60).”

Picture source:

From the hand of Matthew D. Garrett @ http://holy-icons.com/category/feastdays/

Research sources:

Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America @ http://www.goarch.org/special/listen_learn_share/sunday_of_myrrhbearers

That Toward Which We Journey

April 14th, 2012, Promulgated by Bernie

I have written before of my preference for chancel images that communicate the eschatological nature of the Liturgy. In my opinion, such images should generally provide a hopeful vision of the final glory toward which we are drawn and for which we hunger and thirst.

O God, you are my God, for you I long;
for you my soul is thirsting.
My body pines for you
like a dry, weary land without water.
So I gaze on you in the sanctuary
to see your strength and your glory. Psalm 63: 2-4

Whatever the literal images chosen for a chancel ceiling or wall, I believe they should be rendered in a style that suggests a glorified or sanctified state of being. This, I believe, rules out a realistic interpretation. (I also rule out distorting abstraction and non-objective interpretations. Naturalism, however, is required.) Realism, in my opinion, is more appropriate to devotional works.

 (Click on the picture to see a larger, clearer image)

Saint Francis by Alfredo Arreguin

 

I have also written before that it is in the nature of stained glass and mosaic to express transfiguration. The luminosity of stained glass and pixilation of mosaic figures naturally seem to suggest an elevated state of being. By way of derivation, more traditional media, such as paints, can have the same visual impact if the medium is worked to imitate luminosity or pixilation. I do not mean a slavish imitation but rather a tendency toward luminosity or faceted color/shape. I also, of course, do not mean to imply that there are no other ways to suggest transcendence. I mention these two here because they seem to me descriptive of the work of artist Alfredo Arreguin. His painting Saint Francis is the painting featured in this post.1

In addition, as part of posts here at Cleansing Fire I have indicated my preference for liturgical imagery and decoration that is suggestive of a combination of royal court and garden. Such a decorative program predisposes the participants to receive the graces of the sacraments by experiencing the liturgy as a foretaste of the divine liturgy, in paradise -in the courts of heaven. The Old Testament is full of references to God as king and to the courts of the Lord and his holy Temple. So decorated, a church chancel becomes a vision of our ultimate goal, the saints and hosts of heaven surrounding the altar and throne of the Lamb. Garden imagery reminds us that we started (and fell from) a garden, and it is to a garden that we are being restored.

We naturally associate richness of color and pattern with royalty and gardens. Not long after the Second Vatican Council, in a fit of iconoclasm, confused clergy and liturgists began painting over not only images, but also beautiful wall patterns, anything suggestive of paradisaical richness. We now call that period of the Church’s liturgical art the ‘beige period.’ Decorative enrichment was out, and minimalism was in. It supposedly was a way to ‘humanize’ the liturgy, bringing it back down to earth. As a result of such a sophomoric approach, we lost sight of our ultimate destination and became stuck,  in our present state, wandering about aimlessly. Interestingly, the period – the mid-1970s- saw the emergence in the visual arts of a movement that was a reaction to a minimalist style in the arts. ‘Minimalism’ had come to represent stark impersonality and so painters and other artists of the new style produced works that consisted of complex and generally bright, colored patterns (abstract, figurative, or a mixture of both).2 Decorative art, to them, was a humanizing influence! It is also intriguing that most of the artists who initiated the Pattern and Decoration movement (P&D movement)3 were women influenced by the feminist concern with highly decorative crafts such as quilt-making that have traditionally been the preserve of women.”4 Ironically, many Catholic women liturgists (and women of power in the Church) have beige paint on their hands.

Arreguin’s St. Francis seems to communicate a physical world transformed and full of divine life. This painting lifts us out of this life and places us in front of St. Francis, in heaven. A desire to linger with Saint Francis fills us. It is the theological equivalent of the aesthetic experience of wishing to prolong the pleasure we experience in a beautiful image or natural scene.

The individuality of the saint is affirmed through the traditional iconography of a monk’s robes and tonsure as well as the stigmata and cross which are unique to St. Francis. The fingers of the saint’s right hand are positioned in a decidedly traditional pose. Francis’ physical being gradually fades into and out of a sea of color and pattern suggestive of a sanctified environment, an environment consisting of a multitude of birds, flowers and butterflies which are also iconic images for this saint.  Look close, especially in the background and you will see numerous little smiling faces. They suggest the harmony of a redeemed and transformed earth in which the various ‘things’ of nature are understood as close relatives of St. Francis.

I have no idea if my response to this painting fits with the artist’s conscious intention –it was not, to my knowledge, created to be a liturgical work. It seems to me, however, that the artist has a ‘Catholic’ disposition and view of things.5 I can only imagine what beautiful –Catholic– imagery he could create for some parish!

Alfredo M. Arreguin is affiliated with Linda Hodges Gallery. You can see a few of his other images on its website.

____________________________

 

1 Some of Arreguin’s Marian images were shown in a previous post, here. I suggest reading or rereading that post to understand more my thinking on this artist’s work.

2 IAN CHILVERS. “Pattern and Decoration movement.A Dictionary of Twentieth-Century Art. 1999. Encyclopedia.com. 11 Apr. 2012 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>.

3 also known as the ‘New Decorativeness’

4 IAN CHILVERS

5 Arreguin is originally from Moreila, Michoacan, Mexico (1935). He developed as an artist in Seattle where he has resided since 1958. I suppose his Mexican roots –steeped in Catholic spirituality and imagery- influenced him.

__________________________

Photo Credits:

Quilt Photo

The Descent into Hell

April 8th, 2012, Promulgated by Bernie

Previously in the Icons of the Great Feasts series

(Click on pictures to see a larger image)

“The Descent into Hell”

by Rolland Luke Dingman

The Resurrection

The actual Resurrection of Jesus Christ was never represented in the ancient tradition of the Church. Previously to its depiction, the Church used the Old Testament scene of the Prophet Jonah coming out of the belly of the whale. In fact, the story of Jonah –usually summarized in one scene: Jonah being either swallowed by the whale or expelled from the mouth of the whale- was one of the most often depicted in the catacombs. The scene remained popular right up to the 6th century.

"Jonah Expelled from the Mouth of the Whale", 3rd century, Rome, Catacomb of Sts. Marcellinus and Peter

"Women At the Tomb with Spices", ca. 230, Dura Europos house church

In the 3rd century, the historical Resurrection, based on the Gospel story, is obliquely represented in the scene of the appearance of the angel to the women bringing spices to the tomb. A few centuries later, the Descent into Hell, from which comes our icon, represented the Resurrection for the first time on one of the ciborium columns of the Basilica de San Marco in Venice, Italy. These last two scenes or images –the women bringing the spices and the descent into hell- comprise the Easter icons of the Eastern Rite Catholic and Orthodox Churches. The Western Church enthusiastically produced images of the actual historical Resurrection beginning in the Renaissance period.

Nowhere in the ancient tradition of the Church do we find an image of the actual historical Resurrection. It is also of interest that the Resurrection of Christ –Easter– is not included among the twelve Great Feasts of the Eastern Rite or Orthodox Churches. Keep in mind that the actual Resurrection is not described by the Gospel writers, either.

“With us, it is the feast of feasts and the celebration of celebrations; it exceeds all other festivals, as the sun excels the stars…” (St. Gregory the Theologian)

Unlike the Raising of Lazarus, a miracle, the Resurrection of Christ is impossible for human perception for it was a demonstration of the absolute omnipotence of the Savior and initiates our own future resurrection, both of which are impossible to comprehend by the human senses.

Also, in the Eastern Liturgy, a parallel is drawn between the Resurrection and Christ’s Nativity.

“Having preserved the seals intact, O Christ, Thou hast arisen from the tomb, and having left unbroken the seals of the immaculate Virgin in Thy Nativity, Thou hast opened to us the gates of Paradise.” (6th Canticle of the Eastern Canon)

Both events are deeply mysterious and inaccessible to our senses. There are no natural outer signs that we could observe. It is unfathomable and so the tradition of representing only the moment before the actual Resurrection, the descent into hell, and the moment after, the angel appearing to the spice-bearing women, developed.

The Descent into Hell

The Gospel writers do not say anything of the descent into hell. Only St. Peter speaks of it in his words on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:14-39) and, in the 3rd chapter of his first Epistle (1 Peter 3:19) –“He went and preached unto the spirits in prison.” The iconography comes to us mostly from the apocryphal gospel of Nicodemus in which Christ’s triumph over Satan and the Kingdom of Death is thrillingly described.

In the icon we see depicted the moment of Christ’s complete degradation to the very depths of fallen humanity. To redeem humanity by experiencing everything possible to experience as a human, Jesus descended to Hades. It is there that Adam and Eve were confined after their deaths and with them all who followed in the sleep of death. We see that Christ has pulled down the gates of hell which he now steps on. His stunning white garments contrast with the gaping black hole at the center of the earth. Death, or Satan, lies shackled in the darkness. Just when Satan thought he had won, he finds himself triumphed over. Christ appears not as a captive but as a Conqueror to deliver the imprisoned. Adam and Eve are literally pulled out of their tombs by the Lord, the Master of Life. The first Adam rescued by the new Adam.

Also rescued with Adam and Eve are all the Old Testament saints. Representing them, on the left, wearing crowns and royal robes are King David and King Solomon. Between them and Christ is John the Baptist. As he did while alive John points out the arrival of the Savior. On the right in the icon is Abel, holding a shepherd’s staff. It was the shepherd Abel, a son of Adam, who sacrificed one his best lambs to God. He himself was killed by his brother Cain and thus became the first to taste death. Here he meets Jesus, the victor over death. With Abel is Moses who, like John the Baptist, is one of the first to recognize the Lord and so gestures toward Him.

But, while the icon depicts the lowest point to which Christ could descend –his total debasement– it also shows us the first light of the coming Resurrection. The brilliant white robed figure of Christ radiates golden beams of light within a powerful blue colored mandorla which pierces and breaks through the arching rock cliffs.

In some versions of this icon nails, and broken chains and locks from the fallen gates are scattered about. Often angels are shown binding Satan with the chains. Christ sometimes holds a scroll symbolizing His preaching to the dead; sometimes He holds a cross in the form of a staff, a symbol of victory.

References

1. Leonid Ouspensky & Vladimir Lossky, The Meaning of Icons, (Crestwood, St. Vadimir’s Seminary Press, 1989)

2. The Mystical Language of Icons, Solrunn Nes, (Grand Rapids, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2005)

Picture Sources

Descent into Hell icon: http://www.lukedingman.com/icons3.htm

Jonah and the Whale (edited): http://employees.oneonta.edu/farberas/arth/smarthistory/early_christianity_smarthistory.html

Great Thursday Icon

April 5th, 2012, Promulgated by Bernie

Previously here

 

 

“Mystical Supper” by Rolland Luke Dingman

Troparion


Of thy Mystical Supper,

O Son of God, accept me today as a communicant

for I will not speak of thy Mystery to thine enemies,

neither will I give thee a kiss as did Judas

but like the thief will I confess thee;

Remember me, O Lord, in thy Kingdom.

Westerners recognize this scene as the Last Supper while in the East it is known as the Mystical Supper. Holy Thursday is known in the Eastern Church (both Catholic and Orthodox) as Great Thursday.

The word mystic in the Eastern title of this icon comes from the Greek word mystikos and signifies sacrament, communicating through the title that Christ instituted the Blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist at the last supper with His apostles.1

The group is shown all seated on the same side of a semi-circular table, the common arrangement, at the time, utilized for large dinner groups. Servers brought the dishes to the table from the empty side of the table. Sometimes tables were rectangle or “U” shaped with the diners seated to the outside. It was usual for the host or the guest of honor to sit on the left end of the table as seen from the entrance door. Some icons show that arrangement. More commonly, Christ is depicted seated in the center of the group with the twelve apostles evenly flanking Him. St. Peter sits, appropriately, at the right hand of the Lord. St. John, the “beloved apostle” appears to be gesturing toward the bread and wine –the Body and Blood; the Sacrament- and Christ lovingly places His left hand on John’s far shoulder, gently pulling him toward Him. In some icons, St. John is shown reclining his head on the Lord’s breast.

All of the figures, except one, are shown full face; we can see both eyes. Only Judas, the betrayer, is shown in profile with only one eye visible to symbolize his dishonesty.2 In some icons Judas is seated at the table on the side opposite the apostles and Jesus. In others, his face may be darkened by shadow. In still others he is the one reaching for a bag of money.

The long wall and towers in the background are suggestive of the Jerusalem Temple –the show bread of Jerusalem Temple was a type of the Bread of Everlasting Life instituted on Great Thursday3 and the sacrifices of the Temple were a type of Christ’s sacrifice. The curtain is meant to indicate that the supper scene is taking place indoors.

Finally, Christ appears in the traditional pose of Christ Pantokrator (Omnipotent, All Powerful) Ruler of the universe.

The Mystical Supper icon is usually over the royal doors of the iconostasis screen in most Orthodox or Eastern Catholic churches. In front of this icon is where the faithful come to receive the Eucharist at the Divine Liturgy (Mass). Beyond the icon, at the altar, is where the mystery of the Holy Eucharist is celebrated.

Footnotes

1 The Mystical Language of Icons, Solrunn Nes, (Grand Rapids, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2005) p74

2 <http://www.comeandseeicons.com/pascha/phi02.htm>3 Jesus and the Jewish Roots of the Eucharist: Unlocking the Secrets of the Last Supper, Brant Pitre, (New York, Doubleday Religion, 2011)
Picture Sources Mystical Supper Icon: http://www.lukedingman.com/icons3.htm

Icons of the Great Feasts: Palm Sunday

April 1st, 2012, Promulgated by Bernie
This entry is part 5 of 10 in the series Great Feasts

Continuing our series on icons of the Great Feasts of the Church Year

Previously here

(Click on picture for a larger image.)

Icon of “The Entry Into Jerusalem” by Rolland Luke Dingman

The depiction of Christ’s triumphal entry into Jerusalem entered the Christian repertoire of images toward the end of the 3rd century but blossomed in popularity following the Emperor Constantine’s legalization of Christianity in 313. It is always interesting to try and determine why a story or symbol began to appear in Christian art when it did. All through the 20th century historians assumed that the scene had imperial overtones as the depiction seemed to be copied from scenes of imperial adventus representations, scenes in which an emperor triumphantly entered a city to remind the inhabitants that the city belonged to him. Christ’s Entry image was thought to bestow religious legitimacy on imperial power by associating the Entry scene with the adventus images. It supposedly worked in reverse as well: Christ took on an imperial aura. We now know that just the opposite was true. The scene was an anti-imperial image.1

Roman Emperor’s Adventus

The message is in the details. There is the donkey, a humble beast of burden, which is in contrast to the proud imperial chariot of the emperor2. Christ wears the garb of a philosopher and holds a scroll which indicate a person who deals in higher, spiritual truths; the emperor wears the boots and short tunic of a warrior emperor who deals in earthly blood and guts. Christ is accompanied by his apostles who also wear philosophers’ clothing; the emperor is escorted by contingents of armed infantry and cavalry. Crowds of people wildly greet Christ, spreading cloaks on the ground before him and waving palms. There are no crowds greeting the emperor. Christ greets the people with a blessing; the emperor stares straight ahead, not condescending to acknowledge anyone or anything. The message is clear: Christ’s power is so far above earthly power that no impressive display is necessary. Even after earthly power has its way with Christ on Good Friday he will triumphantly rise from the grave on Easter Sunday. The crucified and risen Lord is the hope of persecuted Christians.

The Entry scene was a hopeful image and became popular at the height of the worst persecution Christians had suffered –just before Christianity was legalized. Following legalization the scene celebrated the victory that had been hoped for. The interpretation remains the same even today.

This is the iconic image for Palm Sunday (now called Passion Sunday) or, The Feast of the Entry Into Jerusalem as it is known in the Eastern Church. The icon exudes a festive quality expressive of the character of the day itself which contrasts with the stern and reflective mood of Lent.3 The icon and feast look forward to the joy of Easter. Actually the cause of this jubilant public celebration was the raising of Lazarus recounted in the Gospel read out the Sunday before Palm Sunday.4 Word had spread among the citizens of Jerusalem concerning the miracle and…

“…much people that were come to the feast, when they heard that Jesus was coming to Jerusalem, took branches of palm trees, and went forth to meet him.” (John 11:12, 13)

The palm branch was a symbol of joyful celebrating and Jews used them in welcoming very important persons. The branches, in Middle Eastern cultures, were also a symbol of courage and valor and so were presented as a reward to conquerors. Christ is the Conqueror of Death.

Usually, children play a large role in the Entry icons.5 There is often one sitting in a palm tree which stands in, or bends over, the center of the composition. More often than not, it is children and not adults who spread cloaks on the ground before the donkey. Still other children wave palms with the adults. The Gospel writers do not mention children although we can assume children would have been part of the crowd. The Evangelist Matthew, however, mentions children welcoming the Lord after His entry, when He drove the traders out of the Temple and cured the sick. Their role 6 may be indicated by Christ’s words, “Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings hast thou perfected praise” (Ps. 8:3). (Also, [Mark 10:15] whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it.) The young children saw Jesus simply as a King and celebrated him as such with no thought of gain or earthly power. The adults on the other hand were expecting an earthly power –a conqueror over their enemy, Rome. The children were celebrating the Conqueror of Death –that had been His accomplishment. In the Bible (4 Kings 9:13), spreading garments is done for an anointed king and since Christ is the Anointed One whose kingdom is not of this world the garments are spread before Him by children instead of by adults.

So, the Entry depicts the installation of the King of Glory in His Kingdom, the blessed Kingdom of God -the heavenly Jerusalem. His installation will take place as a result of His voluntary passion and death in the earthly Jerusalem.7

John Cassian (ca. 365-435) interpreted the scene or story on four levels.8 First, as a literal historic account of Christ’s entry into the Jewish capital, acclaimed as king, a few days before his execution. Second, allegorically or typologically, Jerusalem stands for the Church which Christ established and with which he reunites during every liturgy. Third, in a moral or topological interpretation the city stands for the individual soul who receives Christ in a spiritual way. Fourth, analogically, Jerusalem symbolizes the ‘New Jerusalem’ the heavenly Jerusalem that will come down from heaven and where the kingdom of God will blossom in fullness.

________________________

Endnotes

1 “The Clash of Gods”, Thomas F. Mathews, (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2003) Chapter 2, “The Chariot and the Donkey”

2 Christ rides straddling the horse in images created in the Western Roman Empire; Eastern images normally depict Him side-saddled.

3 “The Meaning of Icons”, Leonid Ouspensky & Vladimir Lossky, (Crestwood, St. Vladimir’s Press, 1989) 176

4 Ouspensky 176

5 Ouspensky 178

6 Ouspensky 178

7 Ouspensky 178

8 “The Mystical language of Icons, Solrunn Nes, (Grand Rapids, William B, Eerdmans Publishing Company) 73

________________________

Picture Source: http://www.lukedingman.com/icons3.htm

________________________

Book Suggestions

The Mystical Language of Icons, Solrunn Nes

The Meaning of Icons, Vladimir Lossky & Leonid Ouspensky

The Great Feasts: The Annunciation

March 26th, 2012, Promulgated by Bernie
This entry is part 1 of 10 in the series Great Feasts

Previously here and here.

(Click on pictures to see larger images)

The Annunciation

Troparion

Today is the Fontainhead of our salvation

and the revelation of the mystery that was planed from all eternity: the

Son of God becomes the Son of the Virgin and Gabriel announces this grace.

Let us join him in crying out to the Mother of God:  “Hail, O Woman full of grace!

The Lord is with you.”

Kontakion

We are your own, O Mother of God!

To you, protectress and leader, our songs of victory!

To you who saved us from danger, our hymn of thanksgiving!

In your invincible might, deliver us from all danger that we may sing to you:

“Hail, O Bride and Maiden ever-pure!”

 

This icon depicts the Archangel Gabriel, carrying a herald’s staff, greeting the Theotokos as the Angel of God appeared to the Virgin Mary to announce the birth of Christ. (Luke 1:26-37). The staff held in the Archangel’s hand is the staff of a messenger.  The Greek word “Kontakion” literally means “from a pole”.  A scroll was rolled up and placed inside a pole and sent by a messenger.  The word “angel” means “messenger” and in this icon the Archangel carries the pole, which carries the message from God. In Western art Gabriel usually holds a white lily, symbol of purity and perpetual virginity.

Mary sits wearing a ‘maphorion’, a veil or large head-shawl, and slippers, her head turned towards the Archangel. Stars placed on both of her shoulders and on top of her head symbolize her ever-virgin life:  “And the Lord said to me:  This gate shall be shut. It shall not be opened and no man shall pass through it:  because the Lord God of Israel hath entered in by it.  And it shall be shut…and behold the glory of the Lord filled the house of the Lord.’ (Ezekiel 44: 3-4)  She remained God’s undefiled, deified temple.

The Theotokos is shown in the icon either standing or with a pedestal under her feet.  A pedestal is a symbol of honor and is used in icons of Christ, the Theotokos, John the Baptist, and Simeon in the Presentation of Mary in the Temple icon.

The All Holy Virgin is often depicted dropping a spool of royal purple yarn in surprise at the angel’s appearance. She has been spinning for the high priest in the Temple. We read in the Protoevangelium of James that one of her duties in the Temple was to make priestly vestments. In some interpretations she has been spinning the great curtain that hung across the entrance to the Holy of Holies. In most Western versions Mary is seen surprised while at prayer, holding a book of Psalms.

The circle with rays directed at the Virgin is meant to convey the action of the Father through the Holy Spirit in the Incarnation of the Son of God within the Holy Virgin Mary who is “full of grace.”

Urgency is expressed in the figure of the Archangel Gabrielle, his legs apart as if running swiftly to deliver the message. The Virgin exhibits a gesture of perplexity and prudence in the outward palm of her hand and who, after questioning the angel, bows her head in acceptance and submission to the will of God.

Mary’s ‘Yes’ is chanted in the Akathist Hymn, referred to by some as the most beautiful song of praise in honor of the Theotokos of all times. Here is the first of 24 strophes.

An Archangel was sent from heaven to greet the Mother of God, and as he saw you assuming a body at the sound of his bodiless voice, O Lord, he stood rapt in amazement and cried out to her in these words:
Hail, O you, through whom Joy will shine forth! Hail, O you, through whom the curse will disappear!
Hail, O Restoration of the Fallen Adam! Hail, O Redemption of the Tears of Eve!
Hail, O Peak above the reach of human thought! Hail, O Depth even beyond the sight of angels!
Hail, O you who have become a Kingly Throne! Hail, O you who carry Him Who Carries All!
Hail, O Star who manifest the Sun! Hail, O Womb of the Divine Incarnation!
Hail, O you through whom creation is renewed! Hail, O you through whom the Creator becomes a Babe!
Hail, O Bride and Maiden ever-pure!

(L) Rogier van der Weyden, 1435; (R) Philippe de Champaigne, 1644

(L) Simone Martini, 1313-1342; (R) Dante Gabriel Rossetti, England, 1850

(L) Pietro Perugino, 1489; (R) John William Waterhouse, 1914

___________________________________

Source of images.

Nina Somerset, Liturgical Artist

March 21st, 2012, Promulgated by Bernie

From the New Liturgical Movement website.

by David Clayton

 

…The website of …  St Silas the Martyr, talks about a devout Christian who was a daily communicant (I can’t see any direct reference on the site, but I am guessing that this is a high Anglican church and not Catholic. The website for the church is here). It says that she trained as an art student in the Bournemouth (England) in the 1920s. I would describe her style as derived from the pre-Raphaelite and the Victorian neo-gothic movement.

These movements took their inspiration from the late gothic period, prior to the High Renaissance. I am not always enamoured with the art of this inspiration (although I do like the neo-gothic arthitecture very much). Pre-Raphaelite painting in particular is too…

…Nina Somerset’s art works, I feel because she is working so as to try to…

Read the entire article here

On the Vocation of the Catholic Artisan

March 13th, 2012, Promulgated by Bernie

From The New Liturgical Movement

…whether we are speaking of sacred architecture, sacred vestments, sacred music or any other liturgical accoutrements, while they are not ends in themselves (and should not be so approached), these things do indeed matter for they not only relate to the Faith, they relay it and help to incarnate it.

Read the whole post here

Savannah Georgia’s Cathedral Church

March 12th, 2012, Promulgated by Bernie

Can you stand a peek at another cathedral?

(See a video that I made of the Cathedral, here.)

I was fortunate to visit the cathedral church of Savannah, Georgia (St. John the Baptist) a couple of weeks ago and was delighted with what I saw.

(click on photos to see larger images) 

(1)

The Cathedral has published a book that displays the art of the Cathedral and provides interesting historical background as well as religious definitions and explanations.2 I’ve reproduced several of the book’s photographs for this post.

Savannah Cathedral (3)

The first thing that struck me about the decorative program of this church appears high up in the clerestory, above the nave. The murals there led me to ask if there was a book available that would explain not only the personages in those murals but also the subjects and symbols that were in abundance throughout the rest of building. A beautiful book it is.

Those murals in the clerestory, along each side of the nave and on each side of the transept(s), depict a celestial procession of saints realistically portrayed against a regally patterned, flat, pinkish, wall paper-like, background. I immediately thought of the tapestry procession of saints in the controversial Los Angeles Cathedral.

Los Angeles Tapestries (4)

 

5

A celestial procession of saints as part of the decorative program of a church goes way back to the earliest Christian churches. The only surviving ‘house-church’ (ca. 243), at Dura Europos in Syria, shows a procession, in the baptistery, of the three women to the tomb of Christ.

Three women at the tomb. Dura Europos, Syria (243) (6)

Sant'Apollinare Nuovo (7)

Probably the best known example is in Sant’Apollinare Nuovo (561) in Ravenna, Italy where processions of saints line the clerestory walls of the nave (see a clip here). Processions of 22 virgins appear below the saints on one side of the nave and 26 martyrs, on the opposite side.

I don't think churches "in the round" work because they focus inward on the community too much and not enough on the Lord. But, I give this parish credit for including the saints above and around them. (Photo has been edited to emphasize the 'clerestory.') (8)

A program of saints hovering above the nave of a church is an excellent way to reinforce a congregation’s sense of the communion of saints (a ‘Catholic’ concept). The saints, as well as the congregation, are participating in the liturgy from heaven, represented by church imagery high up on the walls of the nave. In my opinion, the suggestion of timelessness (‘God’s time’) is an important goal for church architecture. It is impressively achieved in a traditionally arranged long nave which leads to -and ends at- the altar where a strong eschatological image is displayed behind/above the altar.
Psalm 84, the first in today’s morning prayer from the Liturgy of the Hours,  suggests that  processional imagery in the nave of a church is most approriate:
“My soul is longing and yearning,
is yearning for the courts of the Lord.”
                               +
“They walk with ever growing strength,
they will see the God of gods in Zion”
And, from Revelation 15:4 of today’s morning prayer:
“All peoples shall come and worship in your presence”
Liberals, progressives (or whatever the term should be) often invoke the image of journeying but it is interpreted in their ‘creative’ liturgies and church environments as ‘wandering.’ It never seems clear to me as to where they are journeying to, except inward toward the earthly confined community. In an environment like the Savannah Cathedral the journey is clearly to Zion and to the celestial celebration. The saints have successfully gone ahead of us -that’s why they are depicted in a higher register, above our heads. They encourage and help us by accompanying us; journeying, not wandering aimlessly.
Let’s also remember that Biblical history -salvation history- has an absolute beginning and an absolute end. Like an arrow it flies straight to the target from a definite starting point.

John points to the Lamb of God. Apse window. (9)

The Savannah Cathedral’s decorative program follows one type of Catholic tradition that emphasizes eschatological treatment of a scriptural scene; in this case, the Baptism of Christ and the story surrounding St. John the Baptist. It is in the nature of stained glass to transfigure even realistically rendered imagery into a vision of sanctification.  And so it is in the situation here: the saints of the murals in this Cathedral process toward the chancel (toward the altar of sacrifice and the table of the celestial banquet) in which are three luminous windows each proclaiming around the head of St. John “Behold, the Lamb of God”. (You recall, I hope, the image of the Agnus Dei -the Lamb of God- we saw in the chancel of the Washington Cathedral.)

10

Overlooking the altar, on each side, are the four evangelists participating from their box seats in the clerestory.

Transept window. (11)

The windows of the transept in St. John the Baptist are also quite beautiful and symmetrically programmed opposite each in the transept. In the north is depicted The Ascension of Our Lord and in the south, The Assumption of Mary. Both hopeful images for the successful completion of our journey. Below the transept windows are lancet windows of saints, the Christ Child, and the Holy Virgin.

12

There are Stations of the Cross, of course. These were made in Munich, Germany and installed in 1900. You can’t get to enjoy Easter without enduring Good Friday. Appropriately, these are located just slightly above eye level.

__________________________________

1 -by Bernie

2, 3, 9, 11 -Aviles, Suzanne, Art and Symbols of the Cathedral of Saint John the Baptist, (2007) Diocese of Savannah, 222 Harris Street, Savannah, Georgia 31410. www.savannahcathedral.org The book is available for $20 and includes photographs of nearly all the works in the church as well as a wealth of information both historical and religious.

7 Sant’Apollinare Nuovo Tango7174

4 Los Angeles Cathedral

Tapestry Saints

8 Anne Spenny (original photo has been altered) Corpus Christi University Parish, Toledo, Ohio

10, 11 -Bernie

Saint Matthew the Apostle Cathedral, Washington D.C.

March 6th, 2012, Promulgated by Bernie

I visited the cathedral church of Washington D.C. this past weekend –the Cathedral of Saint Matthew the Apostle. Most my age probably remember this church from the funeral of President John F. Kennedy. The church was cleaned and restored in 2003 and the results are stunning. What was a fairly dark and somber interior is now restored to its original brilliance. The cleaned mosaics shimmer under the newly installed lighting.

(Click on images to see a larger size.)

One of America’s foremost muralists, Edwin Howland Blashfield (1848-1936), designed and executed the mosaics in the chancel, on the pendentives and in the Blessed Sacrament Chapel. His assistant, Vincent Aderente (1880-1941), executed the painted murals which where designed by Blashfield.

View a short video clip I made.

The Cathedral beautifully expresses the environment of a Temple of Christian sacrifice. The eschatological nature of the Christian liturgy is clear: heaven and earth are united in timeless liturgy.  The imagery is magnificently rendered to express transfiguration –sanctification in Western terminology, deification in Eastern terms. This is how, I believe, a church interior should be decorated; with a clear expression of what the liturgy is all about and a suggestion of the beauty that awaits us. Many of our new churches -heretically in my opinion- express an aimless journey focused inward on ‘community’ instead of turning toward the Lord.

The chancel imagery is, appropriately, the most powerful in the Cathedral. Saint Matthew the Apostle is depicted seated in a 35 feet high mosaic behind the altar. An angel stands behind him enveloping Matthew with a scroll inscribed with the Saint’s name. The Evangelist holds a book with a passage from his gospel: “Jesus saw a man sitting in the custom house named Matthew and He said to him ‘Follow Me.’ And he arose and followed Him.” In the pediment below, two peacocks –symbols of immortality—drink from a cup from which rises the Chi Rho, the symbol for Christ.

 

Above Saint Matthew, a 49 feet wide and 25 feet high lunette mosaic includes eight angels and the Agnus Dei of the Book of Revelation –Jesus, the Lamb of God, resting on an altar. The circle in the middle of the altar represents eternity. On the right, the bottom angel holds the pillar of Christ’s flagellation; the second angel up holds the crown of thorns; and the third holds the legend IHS, the first three letters of ‘Jesus’ in Greek. On the left, the lowest angel holds the spear that pierced the side of Christ; the next angel holds the hammer and nails; and the third up from the bottom holds the wood of the cross. The angels closest to the Lamb hold trumpets and herald the Gospel. The imagery is strongly evocative of the Book of Revelation and the Catholic understanding of the sacrifice of Christ as ritually ’made present’ on the altar below.

The Chapel of Saint Anthony of Padua provides an interesting contrast. Off the east side of the nave, the slightly more realistic mosaic is architecturally framed to create the illusion of a landscape outside that side of the building. An historical painted mural of saintly and eminent Americans is located above the entrance, at the back, and is designed in imitation of Raphael’s famous painting in the Vatican Palace of the School of Athens. On the opposite side from the Saint Anthony Chapel is the Chapel of Our Lady which contains three mosaics by Thomas S. La Farge which represent biblical passages referring to Our Lady and the genealogy of Jesus. Mary looks like she’s doing a tap dance the way she is posed in a sculpture by Gordon S. Kray. (It is beautifully sculpted but… it looks like a tap dancer at the end of her routine.)

The Blessed Sacrament Chapel is outstanding. The Tabernacle is framed by a background illustrating the two disciples from the story of The Road to Emmaus at the moment when they recognized the Lord in the breaking of the bread.

Unfortunately, beautiful enriched imagery is usually considered superfluous or downright ‘politically’ incorrect in today’s Church. We have pretty much jettisoned thinking of Beauty as an attribute of God and an important ingredient in our ‘worship spaces.’ Minimalistic, simplistic, mundane and even ugly are in; uplifting, inspirational and hopeful are out.

Here is the parish website

Icons of the Great Feasts: The Presentation of the Child Jesus in the Temple

February 2nd, 2012, Promulgated by Bernie
This entry is part 3 of 10 in the series Great Feasts

“Now Lord, allow your servant to go in peace, just as you promised: because my eyes have the salvation which you have prepared before all the nations a light for the gentiles and the glory of your people Israel” (Luke 2:29-32)

This feast in the Orthodox world is called The Presentation or The Meeting, and refers to the meeting of Mary and her Child with Simeon the Just (“The Host of God”) and the prophetess Anna. Both were elderly and symbolize the patient waiting of Israel for the long promised messiah, and both represent the prophetic strain within faithful Israel. As such, they are the representatives of the Old Testament in this meeting with the New Testament. Simeon’s canticle, the Nunc Dimittis (see above), identifies the Messiah and prophesizes His role as a light not only for Israel but also for the Gentiles. The event, then, is also a meeting between the promised Messiah and the entire world.

In the above icon, Mary has handed over the Child to Simeon, the ancient holy man, who has received the babe with hands covered as a sign of reference. In some icons, Mary holds the babe. Her hands are covered with the maphorion in a gesture of offering. St. Joseph, on the left, is carrying the offering of poor parents of two turtle doves which represent the Old and New Testaments or, in some interpretations, the Church of Israel and that of the Gentiles. Anna in the icon shown here stands between Mary and Joseph and holds a scroll of prophetic text. In some icons she stands behind Simeon and looks up as a sign of prophetic inspiration.

The scene takes place in the Jerusalem Temple which is represented by an altar covered with a ciborium. The altar sometimes has a cross and a book or scroll. It looks exactly like the earliest altars in the Christian Churches. Mary stands on one side of the altar and Simeon on the other. The Child is often in Simeon’s arms and held over the altar. The symbolism, of course, is of sacrifice both in the Old and New Testaments: Abraham’s near sacrifice of Isaac, and Christ’s sacrifice on the altar of the cross. The Christ Child seems to know instinctively what lies ahead for Him as He reaches back towards his mother for protection and comfort. In some icons He extends his hand in blessing. [1]

The Feast was better known, in the past, in the Latin or Western Church as the Purification of the Holy Virgin and refers to the rite of purification a woman was to perform forty days after the birth of a male child (Leviticus 12:6-8). When the time -forty days- was over the mother was to “bring to the temple a lamb for a holocaust and a young pigeon or turtle dove for sin”; if she was not able to offer a lamb, she was to take two turtle doves or two pigeons; the priest prayed for her and so she was cleansed (Leviticus 12:2-8). Forty days after the birth of Christ Mary complied with this precept of the law, she redeemed her first-born from the temple (Numbers 18:15), and was purified by the prayer of Simeon.

The Feast of the Presentation dates back at least to the fourth century when it was celebrated in Jerusalem with a solemn procession. Finding its way to Constantinople in the sixth century it eventually passed to Rome during the seventh century. In Jerusalem, around 450, lighted candles were held during the office of the Hypapante (“the meeting of the Lord”). The practice was maintained in the Western Church and became known as Candlemas. [2]

According to the Roman Missal the celebrant after Terce, in stole and cope of purple colour, standing at the epistle side of the altar, blesses the candles (which must be of beeswax). Having sung or recited the five orations prescribed, he sprinkles and incenses the candles. Then he distributes them to the clergy and laity, whilst the choir sings the canticle of Simeon, “Nunc dimittis”… During the procession which now follows, and at which all the partakers carry lighted candles in their hands, the choir sings the antiphon… The solemn procession represents the entry of Christ, who is the Light of the World, into the Temple of Jerusalem. …during the Middle Ages the clergy left the church and visited the cemetery surrounding it. Upon the return of the procession a priest, carrying an image of the Holy Child, met it at the door and entered the church with the clergy, who sang the canticle of Zachary, “Benedictus Dominus Deus Israel”. [3]

The Feast of the Presentation of the Lord is celebrated on February 2

____________________________________

[1] Russell Hart, The Icon Through Western Eyes, (Springfield, Templegate Publishers, 1991) p53

[2] Leonid Ouspensky & Vladimir Lossky, The Meaning of Icons, (Crestwood, St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1989) p168

[3] Frederick Holweck, Candlemas, The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 3,(New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1908). 25 Jan. 2011 <http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03245b.htm>.

Light of the World

January 26th, 2012, Promulgated by Bernie

Yesterday, January 25, was the Feast of the Conversion of St. Paul.

The iconic painting of this moment in the life of St. Paul is Caravaggio’s, The Conversion of St. Paul (1601).1 The painting depicts the moment recounted in Chapter 9 of Acts of the Apostles when Saul, soon to be the apostle Paul, fell on the road to Damascus. He heard the Christ say “I am Jesus, whom you persecute, arise and go into the city.”

It is a very dramatic interpretation of the event; theatrical we could say. There are several design principles Caravaggio uses in the painting to involve us in the action. Many modern art critics would, perhaps, concentrate solely on describing and evaluating the artist’s competency in handling the formal principles used in the organization of design. The religious significance behind Caravaggio’s use of the principles of design in this particular painting might escape them -and us, too. 2

Caravaggio was a painter in the Baroque style. There are several design characteristics that artists working in that style commonly exhibit in their work. Among them are an emphasis on foreshortening, the dominance of asymmetry and diagonal linear arrangements, and dramatic lighting (spotlighting, we could call it, in many paintings). These are what I mean by formal design elements and principles. We can never get away from describing and evaluating how an artist formally organizes a work of art because that concerns the grammar that makes up the language he is using. In the case of Caravaggio’s painting of The Conversion of St. Paul we can briefly say that he has employed –among other things- the element of light (and dark) to dramatically focus our attention. He deploys the principle of emphasis through contrast (stark contrast) to emphasize Paul and the horse he has just been thrown down from. Those are some aspects of the formal design of this image. But, I would like to briefly describe how Caravaggio has used one of the formal elements –light and dark- to convey a religious meaning, or to symbolize religious doctrine.

Here is where the artist and the viewer (including the art critic and art historian) have to be on the same page or share the same religious or cultural background.  That is not by any stretch something we can assume in our secular age.

Knowing what we do about the story of the conversion of St. Paul, we at least understand the light as representative of the voice of Christ. Most of us probably stop right there in reading the painting –at the narrative; at the literal message.  And, that is certainly the most important meaning. But, as in scripture, there are several levels of meaning other than the literal.

Yesterday morning I noticed that the suggested hymn for Morning Prayer in the Common of Apostles included the following: “Of Gospel truth they bore the light to brighten earthly night; may we that heavenly light impart to every mind and heart.”3 In this visually dramatic painting of The Conversion of St. Paul we can see the mighty impact that heavenly light physically had on St. Paul. But, we also see in the painting the artist’s intent to communicate the sense of the absolute awesomeness of God’s intrusion into our earthly night. Through the Incarnation, life, and redemptive death of Christ “the dawn from on high (has broken) upon us to shine on those who dwell in darkness and the shadow of death.”4 St. Paul the apostle was to bear the Light of the world to the Gentiles, as we also have been instructed to do.

Light as a symbol of God/Christ, and the Incarnation, is everywhere in scripture, theology, and the visual arts -including architecture.  The whole Gothic style of architecture is based upon the symbolic power of light to communicate the sense of divinity flooding through the glorious stained glass windows. Standing in the nave of a French Gothic cathedral, I am struck by how dark it is inside.5 However, the windows –the glorious windows- glow with intense colors; the warm colors, like the reds, seem to float in front of the cool blues and greens. The abbot responsible for this emphasis on light in the Gothic style, Abbé Suger (ca. 1081-1151), was stirred by the writings of a theologian6 ca. 500 who allegorized God as heavenly light and Jesus as the earthly image of that “Light” from the Gospel of John (1:4-5 and 9) “In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shines in darkness, and the darkness did not overcome it… [He] was the true Light which lights every man who comes into the world.” In the Gothic cathedral we see the same “Light” that pierces the darkness in The Conversion of St. Paul, this time piecing the darkness of the interior of the church. Christ, here, is the luminous window, the image of the Father piercing the darkness of earthly sin.

Here is an afterthought : Religious and liturgical art in the Catholic tradition has so much to offer us and yet, for the most part we have jettisoned that tradition in favor of a more protestant or evangelical theology that views art as a threat and a distraction. Our churches are sterile ‘worship spaces’ and our Liturgy has become a matter of functional concerns. Nothing is allowed to take us beyond the literal. We’ve cut it to the bones and removed the meat of the matter. Our personal relationship with Jesus has been reduced to bumper sticker spirituality and social work.

We might know the stories7 but we no longer understand or experience the stories on more than a literal level.  It has become a strictly sterile experience. The arts –music, art and architecture- enlarge and enrich the religious and spiritual experience and deepen our understanding of truth -and our relationship to Truth. They take us to the level of the allegorical. They can uncover in their own way the implications of the faith and the doctrines of the faith. Why limit our ways of understanding to only the sermon/homily?

 ______________________

1 Painted for the Cerasi Chapel of the Church of Santa Maria del Popolo, in Rome. It is still there.

2 It is a sad part of the fallout of the ascendency of radical secularism in our schools and culture in general that we are losing our ability to read religious works -be they in the visual arts or literature or music- for their original religious meaning.

3 Exultet Orbis Gaudiis, 10th century; translated by Roger Nachtwey, 1965.

4 from the Gospel Canticle (Benedictus) for Morning Prayer

5 Art teachers continue to describe the interior of Gothic cathedrals as brilliantly lit by the light flooding in through the large windows –the large windows being the result of architectural innovation.  But a Gothic cathedral with its original stained glass windows –or colored replacements- is just the opposite; it is noticeably dark. The Light pierces the dark interior in the Gothic cathedral in a different way than in The Conversion of Paul as it causes the brilliant windows to appear suspended in the darkness, illuminating our minds more than the interior.

6 Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite

7 It seems that very few people, especially the young, even know the stories. Only a very few people know, anymore, the symbolism and iconography. Most run-of-the-mill art historians and clergy don’t even know.

Icons of the Great Feasts: The Baptism of the Lord

January 9th, 2012, Promulgated by Bernie

Previously in this series: here, here, here, and here.

The Baptism of the Lord

(Theophany or, even, Epiphany)

(Click on picture for a larger image)

“And straightway coming up out of the water, he saw the heavens opened, and the Spirit like a dove descending upon him: and there came a voice from heaven, saying, ‘Thou art my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased’” -Mark 1: 10, 11 (from the Gospel read at the Matins of the day)

“The River Jordan once turned back before the mantle of Elisha, after Elijah had been taken up into heaven and the waters were divided on this side and on that: The stream became a dry path before him, forming a true figure of the baptism whereby we pass over the changeful course of life. Christ has appeared in the Jordan to sanctify the waters.” -from the Eastern Liturgy for the Baptism of the Lord

Originally, The Baptism of the Lord was celebrated on Epiphany along with the Feast of the Three Kings/Magi and the Wedding in Cana. Over time, the feast of the Baptism was assigned a separate date. The Eastern Orthodox celebrate the feast -which they call The Theophany (showing or appearance of diety)- on January 6. For the Roman Catholic Church and the churches in the Anglican Communion, the Baptism of the Lord is observed on the first Sunday after Epiphany. Most Protestant Christian groups do not specifically celebrate the Baptism as a feast day on the church calendar.

There are three aspects to this feast and its icon: 1) the revelation of the full dogmatic truth of the Trinity and the Divinity of Jesus; 2) the establishment of the New Testament sacrament of Baptism; and, 3) analogies of the Baptism of the Lord with Old Testament prefigurations.

On this day it was revealed that Jesus is the Divine Son of God, and that God is One God, but, a Trinity of Persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. When Jesus came up out of the water, John heard the voice of the Father (“Thou art my beloved Son…”) and saw the Holy Spirit in the form of a dove, confirm this voice. In accordance with the Gospel text, appearing in the icon at the top edge, there is a segment of a circle symbolizing the opening of the heavens and the presence of the Father, which is sometimes also indicated by a hand blessing Jesus. Falling upon the Savior are rays of divine light issuing from the Father and containing the Holy Spirit, appearing in the same kind of circle that we saw enclose the star of the magi in the Nativity of the Lord icon.

On the other hand, as Jesus established the sacrament of the Most Holy Eucharist while celebrating the Old Testament Passover, so He establishes the sacrament of Baptism while performing an act of ablution originating with the Old Testament prophets. But, instead of the water of the Jordan purifying and sanctifying Him, He descends into the water to sanctify the water and to make the water an efficacious sacramental for our own purification and regeneration in our Baptism. He who became sin for us is covered by the waters of the Jordan. He is represented in the icon as standing against a background of water. In this icon the water delicately and rhythmically washes over the legs and feet. In most older style icons the water appears as a flat background without any overlap of the figure of Jesus. The shape of the body of water is often reminiscent of a cave and leaves us with the impression that Christ is immersed in a kind of token burial and that Baptism is meant to signify the death and burial of the Lord. Like Jesus, in Baptism we too go down into the water, and, again like Jesus, we rise up out of the water -but as a new person- filled with the Holy Spirit and new life. In a great many of the images of Baptism from the catacombs the person represented as being baptized -including the Savior himself- is depicted as a child, as new and innocent life.

With Christ’s Baptism -from his going down into the water and rising from it again- water becomes an image not of death  but of birth into new life. Christ’s body has sanctified the water. Each time we dip our fingers into holy water and bless ourselves we should be reminded of the fact that we have been reborn in Christ through the water of Baptism, in the name of the Blessed Trinity.

In addition to Theophany and the institution of the sacrament of Baptism, the icon of the Baptism of the Lord also calls to mind Old Testament prefigurations. The Fathers of the Church explain the appearance of the Holy Spirit at Christ’s Baptism by analogy with Noah’s Flood. As the world was purified by the water of the Flood and a dove brought an olive branch to Noah announcing the end of the flood and the restoration of peace, so also a dove (the Holy Spirit) signifies the remission of sins through God’s merciful sending of his only begotten Son.

Two small figures are sometimes depicted in the water at the feet of the Savior, among the fish in the Jordan. One is usually a naked man with his back turned to the Lord and the other is often a half-naked women running away or riding a fish (not in this icon). The figures correspond to the Old Testament text “The sea saw and fled; Jordan was turned back” (Ps. 113: 3). The male figure is an allegorical figure representing the Jordan in the following text:

“Elisha turned back the river Jordan with the mantle, when Elijah had been taken up, and the waters were divided hither and thither; and the bed of the river was to Elisha a dry pathway, as a true type of Baptism, by which we pass through the changing course of life.” -Troparion for the Sunday before Epiphany

The female figure is an allegory of the sea and refers to the other prefiguration of Baptism -the crossing of the Red Sea by the Hebrews.

John the Baptist extends one hand out over the head of Christ, a sacramental gesture that has always been a part of the liturgy of Baptism. His left hand is outstretched with the palm facing up while he looks up indicating that he is receiving or hearing the word of the Father, “This is my beloved Son…”

The angels are not mentioned in the biblical text but they are mentioned in texts of the Eastern Divine Services. Their function in the scene is uncertain. Some think they are placed there to minister to the Lord when he comes out of the water. It seems this iconographer has made that his interpretation by painting the angels holding towels. In other icons each angel has his hands covered with a pallium (or cloak) as an indication of reverence for Him Whom he serves. Their covered hands imply the Divinity of Jesus which, of course, is the message of the icon. It is the sacred message of the ritual they convey to us that causes them to cover their hands, as we do whenever we handle something precious or scared.

The Baptism of the Lord is celebrated by Roman Catholics today, January 9. It also signals the end of the Christmas season.

_____________________________________

Book suggestion:

The Meaning of Icons by Leonid Ouspensky & Vladimir Lossky

The Great Feasts: Icon Of The Nativity of Our Lord

December 24th, 2011, Promulgated by Bernie
This entry is part 1 of 10 in the series Great Feasts

Previously in this series: here, here, and here

(Click on picture to view a larger, sharper image.)

Novgorod school, attributed to the 15th c., 17 x 21 inches

The Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ

Troparion

Your Nativity, O Christ our God, Has shone to the world the Light of wisdom! For by it, those who worshipped the stars, Were taught by a Star to adore You, The Sun of Righteousness, And to know You, the Orient from on High. O Lord, glory to You!

Kontakion

Today the Virgin brings forth the Transubstantial, And the earth offers a cave to the Unapproachable One! Angels with shepherds glorify Him! The wise men journey with a star! Since for our sake the Eternal God was born as a Little Child!

The figure of the Blessed Mother is usually the first thing people notice in this icon. The figure is normally near the center of the design and is often the largest. In most traditional nativity icons the All Holy Virgin reclines on a portable bed of the kind Jews used while traveling. But, in some icons she sits upright on the bed. The second thing noticed by most people is the black –always black– cave also located somewhere near the center of the design. Thirdly, people notice that Mary and the dark cave are surrounded by ‘scenes’ or episodes from the story and placed in a somewhat barren, rocky or uncomfortable landscape. Finally –and almost overlooked—people see the tiny wrapped figure of the Christ child lying in the manger inside the cave. That wrapped child lying on top of the manger in a dark cave always reminds me of Christ wrapped in a death shroud and laid out on a stone tomb in a sepulcher.

Of course, the Christ child is the intended center of the icon. The small white shape of his swaddling clothes contrasts with the dark shape of the cave as “a spiritual light shinning forth in the shadow of death that encompasses mankind… The black mouth of the cave in the icon is, in its symbolic meaning, precisely this world, stricken with sin through man’s fault, in which ‘the Sun of truth’ shone forth.”1 The uncomfortable landscape might remind us of the wilderness of the Exodus story. There, the Israelites were fed with manna bread from heaven. Here, God Himself has come down from heaven to be the bread of eternal life, the Eucharist.  He is also the sacrificial Lamb laid upon the altar of the wood manger, symbolic of the altar of the wooden cross.

Mary’s posture always suggests underlying dogmatic beliefs. In the Nativity of Our Lord icons her pose can vary in two ways and they address either the Divine or human nature of Jesus.  In some icons of the Nativity of Jesus, Mary is half-sitting, alert and attentive to the child which suggests a lack of the usual suffering associated with child birth. In that case the virginity of Mary and the Divine nature of the child are emphasized. However, in the highlighted icon for this post the humanity of Christ is emphasized through the listlessness and languor of Mary’s reclining pose. Her fatigue suggests that the Incarnation indeed took place in Mary’s womb and she has now brought him forth into the wider world. It was not just all an illusion as the heretical Nestorians taught. God did take on human flesh and become human.

Mary gazes down toward Joseph who sits in the bottom left corner confused and troubled, pondering the improbability of it all. His figure is not part of the mother and child grouping for he is not the father. The devil in the guise of an old shepherd stands before him sowing doubt that the virgin birth is possible. He suggests that if the infant were truly divine He would not have been born in a human way. In the person of Joseph, the icon discloses not only his personal drama, but the drama of all mankind, the difficulty of accepting that which is ‘beyond words or reason’, the Incarnation of God.2 The scene reminds us of our own personal struggles with faith. But Holy Mary looks on in compassion and loving concern –not just at Joseph but even at us in our times of temptation and doubt.

In the bottom right corner two midwives Joseph rounded-up and brought back to the Mother of God are depicted about ready to bathe the baby. Like any other human new-born the Son of God has become subject to the necessities of human life. Often the basin appears like a baptismal font3 or a large chalice which reminds us of the ‘cup’ of the passion from which the Lord will drink.

The angels of the Gloria are at the top of the icon. Messengers as well as worshippers they usually appear with some of them looking up toward heaven glorifying God and some looking down toward man to whom they bring good tidings.4Among the shepherds is usually one playing a flute or reed-pipe, joining the shepherds’ own human music with that of the heavenly strains of the angels. Like the shepherds some of us enjoy communion with heaven while engaged in our daily work while others of us, more sophisticated and learned, are like the Magi in the left side of the icon who “have to accomplish a long journey from the knowledge of what is relative to the knowledge that is absolute, through the object (like the star) that they study.”5

The ox and the ass stand next to the manger and contemplate the Christ Child demonstrating that even the dumb animals can recognize the Creator when He chooses to reveal himself:6 “The ox knows its owner, and the donkey its master’s crib; but Israel does not know, my people do not understand.”7

Finally, from the top of the icon Divinity pierces into the natural world in the form of light beams emanating from the star of the Magi (or from the orb of heaven) illuminating the Child Jesus in the crib. As the story in the Apocryphal gospel of James goes, Joseph and the midwives, when they returned to the cave, were blinded by a bright light shining forth from the grotto, a light so bright that “they could not bear it”;8 as the bright light of the Transfiguration would blind the apostles on Mt. Tabor.9

_________________________________

1 Leonid Ouspensky and Vladimir Lossky, The Meaning of Icons, Crestwood, (St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1989) p 157. The thought, however, comes from a homily attributed to St. Gregory of Nyssa.

2 Ouspensky 160

3 Solrunn Nes, The Mystical Language of Icons, (Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2004) 43

4 Ouspensky 159

5 Ouspensky 159

6 Nes 43

7 Isaiah: 1, 3

8 James 14, 11

9 Nes 43

Book suggestions:

The Meaning of Icons, Vladimir Lossky and Leonid Ouspensky,  (St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1999)

The Mystical Language of Icons, Solrunn Nes,  (Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2004)

The Great Feasts: The Presentation of Mary in the Temple

November 20th, 2011, Promulgated by Bernie
This entry is part of 10 in the series Great Feasts

(Click on picture for a larger image)

The Presentation of Mary in the Temple

 

Troparion

Today is the preview of the good will of God, Of the preaching of the salvation of mankind.  The Virgin appears in the temple of God, In anticipation proclaiming Christ to all.  Let us rejoice and sing to her: Rejoice, 0 Divine Fulfillment of the Creator’s dispensation.

Kontakion

The most pure Temple of the Savior; The precious Chamber and Virgin; The sacred Treasure of the glory of God, Is presented today to the house of the Lord.  She brings with her the grace of the Spirit, Therefore, the angels of God praise her: “Truly this woman is the abode of heaven.”

 

The three year old Mary is presented by her parents Joachim and Anna in the temple where she is received by Zachariah the high priest, who, filled with the spirit is moved to exclaim “Mary, the Lord God has magnified your name to all generations and, by you, to the very end of time, the Lord will show His Redemption to the children of Israel.” Several other virgins can be seen in the icon. They accompanied Mary into the Temple as they have been her attendants.  They all each hold a candle and wool of different colors with which to spin and weave. Mary carries wool of a royal purple that will become the veil of the temple. Mary subsequently ascends a seven-stepped stairway on top of which she is fed by angels.

That which is known about the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary in the Temple is found in the Apocrypha, principally in chapter seven of the Protoevangelium of James, which has been dated by historians prior to the year 200 AD.1 By the ninth century, it is celebrated in the monasteries of southern Italy which had been influenced by the traditions of the Byzantine churches, and by the fourteenth century, it had spread to England. However it was not until 1472 that Pope Sixtus IV extended its celebration to the Western church. 2

Growing up in the Temple:3

Her physical appearance was described as beautiful and cheerful. No one ever saw her angry nor heard her speak evil and all her conversations were full of grace. She was anxious also about her companions (the other young virgins) that they might not sin even in one word or raise their voice in senselessness or act proud before their parents. Mary guarded herself carefully that she might not even inadvertently offend or appear proud before her peers. Thus, even as a young teenager, she gave the impression of one many times her age and was steadfast, immovable and unchangeable in her desire for the things of God.

Mary’s early years in the Temple were spent primarily in prayer and wool-work (weaving, etc.). From daylight to 9:00 a.m. she spent in prayer; from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. she spent doing her weaving; and from 3:00 p.m. until bedtime she returned to prayer. Even in her early years, she became well known as an excellent weaver surpassing old experienced women. Later as a young teenager, she and some other similarly skilled virgins were commissioned to spin the special thread for the new veil for the Holy of Holies that would separate the Holy of Holies from the Holy Place.

Early sources state that Mary spent a lot of her time in the Holy of Holies in prayers. (The Holy of Holies of the Second Temple may have been incomplete and its veil may not have been installed yet). She lived very much like her nephew John the Baptist who was to be born a few years later and she ate just one meal per day. The additional food given her by the priests, she gave to the poor. Angels were recorded as visiting her regularly and sometimes bringing her food, just as an angel brought Elijah food on several occasions (1 Kings 19:5-8).

_______________________________________

1 http://www.ststhanasius.org/media/files/bible_studies/Study_11_21_08.pdf 

2 http://campus.udayton.edu/mary/meditations/Nov21.html. 

3 http://www.ststhanasius.org/media/files/bible_studies/Study_11_21_08.pdf 

Beautiful Church Buildings Lead People to God

November 2nd, 2011, Promulgated by Bernie

From the National Catholic Register

By Jennifer Fulwiler

The other day I was chatting with someone who works at our church, and she mentioned that couples who get married there are well versed in the fullness of the Church’s wisdom on marriage and human sexuality. Engaged couples are required to take a full Natural Family Planning course (not just an intro class), and they also must take a class on the Theology of the Body, so that they can understand why the Church teaches what it does. Though I’m not naive enough to think that every single couple who goes through the system is going to immediately throw out their birth control pills, the quality of the marriage preparation process undoubtedly leads a lot of them to at least remain open to the Church’s teaching in this area. Though some may initially grumble about the extensiveness of the process, I’ve heard that many couples end up being extremely grateful that they were given such thorough practical and theoretical information to get their marriages off to the right start.

After thinking about this for a moment, I had a delayed reaction. I asked: “Wait, how do you get all these couples to agree to do this?” Given the current cultural climate regarding marriage, I was surprised that more couples didn’t decide to get married in a different …

Read more

New Icon for UR Newman Community

October 22nd, 2011, Promulgated by Bernie

"Mother of God" icon by Minhhang K. Huynh, UR Newman Catholic Community

 

One of our staff writers learned of the appearance of a new piece of liturgical art in our diocese. The UR Newman Community recently unveiled a newly created Marian icon.

The Community’s October 16 bulletin mentions that the Newman Community had started (in 1999) a small collection of images of the Blessed Mother from the many cultures of its students. The collection has grown to over 15 images.

The bulletin also explains that over seventy people were involved in the current selection and commissioning of a Marian image and the composition of a related prayer. Apparently, holy cards have been printed.

Well known local liturgical artist Minhhang K. Huynh was commissioned to ‘write’ a Byzantine/Eastern style icon. It is a stunningly beautiful work. Its prototype is the “Mother of God Eleousa (the Merciful)” or the “Mother of God Oumilenie (of affectionateTenderness).” From what Father Brian Cool, Director of Catholic Pastoral Care, wrote in the bulletin concerning the icon it seems the community wishes to stress Mary’s virtue of Mercy.

Mercy (Eleousa) and affectionate tenderness (Oumilenie) are two aspects of the basic Eleousa prototype.

 

Even though in both cases (Eleousa and Oumilenie) the faces of Mother and Child are touching affectionately, Eleousa and Oumilenie express two different aspects of the icon of the Mother of God: Eleousa refers to the virtue of Mary, mercy, Oumilenie refers to the sentiment experienced by the Child, following the intervention of his Mother, of affectionate Tenderness. The name Eleousa pertains directly to the Mother, whereas the name Oumilenie pertains to the Child.[1]

Among several ways the icon unites mother and child is the very nice alignment of contours that join the two figures into an intimate embrace of tenderness.

Father Cool added some personal observations on the icon in the Community Sunday bulletin:

“Honestly, my breath is taken away when I look at this image. Look at it from many angles. Ponder the subtle and the not so subtle. Pray with it and let it lead you to the sane devotion Mary had to Christ whom she holds so tenderly and close. …I believe this is the most significant project that I have been part of while here at Newman. It will inspire many for generations.”

A previous related post here.

…………………………………

[1] http://www.iconsexplained.com/iec/iec_icons_mother_of_god_of_tenderness.htm