Cleansing Fire

Defending Truth and Tradition in the Lay-Run Roman Catholic Diocese of Rochester

Archive for August, 2010

Local Catholic schools challenged

August 31st, 2010, Promulgated by Mike

Today’s D&C features a front page, above-the-fold article on the enrollment challenges facing our local Catholic schools.  While there are some bright spots, the negatives seem to outnumber the positives.  The article sums it up as follows:

enrollments have been shrinking for decades and tuition continues to rise. The declines in the elementary and middle schools pose potential trouble for the Catholic high schools locally.

That trouble crossed the boundary from potential to actual at Nazareth High School, which closed its doors for good this past June due to continuing low enrollment.

Nazareth’s loss seems to be others’ gain:  At Our Lady of Mercy enrollment is the highest it’s been in 30 years and Aquinas is reporting numbers it hasn’t seen in 35 years. Of course, these numbers include students in the schools’ junior high grades, while the old records were for high school programs only.

The news isn’t so good at Bishop Kearney, where enrollment is down some 48 students, or about 9%.  The school was actually expecting a worse fall-off and their president was quoted as saying that BK officials “actually feel pretty good about exceeding our projections.”

The article goes on to cite some national statistics …

Nationwide, enrollment for all Catholic schools has dropped about 20 percent since 1999, according to the National Catholic Education Association. Enrollment for grades 9 through 12 declined about 5 percent in the same period. Catholic school enrollment peaked in the 1960s with about 5.2 million students and almost 13,000 schools. Today, there are about 2.1 million students in about 7,000 Catholic schools.

A brief history of diocesan control of Monroe County’s Catholic schools

In June 1988 there were 39 parish-run, Catholic elementary schools in Monroe County educating 16,044 children. That fall all those schools were removed from parish control and organized into a quadrant system. One year later the downsizing began with the closure of 8 schools.

In the fall of 1994 the quadrant system was replaced by the Monroe County Catholic School System and by 1995-96 we were down to 30 schools and 7,606 students. Loss of students and school closings continued over the next decade and by 2005-06 those numbers had fallen to 24 and 4,806.

June 2008 brought with it the closing of another 13 schools and the following fall the 11 survivors opened with roughly 3,700 students. In 2009-10 that latter number had fallen to 3,446.

This fall two of these schools will revert to parish control and the combined enrollment at the remaining 9 is expected to be down about 100 students.

Nationwide Catholic elementary school data as found in various editions of the Official Catholic Directory shows a 20% decline in the number of schools from 1994 to 2010, along with a 26% decline in the number of students.  In that same period Monroe County has seen a 72% decline in its number of Catholic schools and a 77% decline in Catholic school students.

This is by far the worst record among similar-sized dioceses in the U.S.

Sign The Manhattan Declaration

August 31st, 2010, Promulgated by Ben Anderson

Regardless of whether or not you agree with Chuck Colson and other Evangelicals who have worked on the Manhattan Declaration this document is worth signing. Robert P. George is one of the main backers of it. Its simplicity should make it signable by all Christians. What a powerful witness if our local priests would sign on. Perhaps we could start a list of those who have. If you are a priest in this diocese or know of any who have signed on, please shoot me an email informing me of such.

Honest and Open Dialogue . . . Yeah, Sure

August 31st, 2010, Promulgated by Gen

The following comes from the Archdiocese of Boston. I got quite a chuckle out of it.

The Archdiocese of Boston, under attack by anonymous conservative Catholic bloggers, has blocked access to one of the websites from computers within the church’s Braintree headquarters.

Terrence C. Donilon, a spokesman for the archdiocese, said church officials blocked the site because it had become a distraction, not out of a desire to squelch debate. Its authors, he said, were “actively spamming the employees of the archdiocese with links to the site, interfering with their work day.’’ He pointed out that employees could still visit it from their home computers.

The Boston Catholic Insider, the most lively of several blogs that have targeted the archdiocese, portrays Cardinal Sean P. O’Malley as a lax administrator and accuses his top aides of straying from Catholic doctrine and values.

Personally, I think the Catholic bloggers of Boston should look around and realize that many dioceses (Rochester, Albany, Miami, etc. . . ) have it much worse than they do. Cardinal O’Malley wears his Franciscan habit in public . . . when was the last time you saw one of our religious/administrators wearing a habit in public, let alone own and posses one? But that’s beside the point. What I’d like to say is that this really highlights the trend of higher-ups who stray from Catholic teaching. (I’m not referencing O’Malley, but some of those under him.) When they are confronted (like our Theology on Tap series shows) they become bitter, evasive, and downright rude. And after they realize that those “conservatives” can’t be silenced, they enact their fascist decrees of censorship. The only equivalents I can think of here are the following:

  • Ray Grosswirth doesn’t permit commentors to post on his blog.
  • The Catholic Courier deletes comments (sometimes) which call out various people on various teachings.
  • The Diocese of Rochester’s Facebook page has removed comments from our staffers and supporters.

I’d like to take this time to remind you that, unlike the Diocese of Rochester, we here at Cleansing Fire are not the thought-police. Liturgy Police, naturally, but not thought-police. We have limits, you know.

OLM on the block

August 31st, 2010, Promulgated by Mike

The former Our Lady of Mercy Parish in Greece is now officially for sale.

I’m not sure how long this sign has been up, but it seems fairly new.  It is on a road I frequently use and I first noticed it about two weeks ago.

Fr. Tanck Attempts to Close St. Thomas and St. Salome

August 31st, 2010, Promulgated by Dr. K

Cleansing Fire has received a copy of the letter which the Irondequoit parish leaders are about to send out to their parishioners concerning the Mass schedule for the newly merged parish (now titled “Blessed Kateri Tekakwitha”). If you wish to read the letter in its entirety, and I encourage you to do so, please click here for the PDF file. In the letter, Frs. Tanck CSB, Horan, Leone and Rice CSB state that the churches of St. Thomas the Apostle and St. Salome will close. The St. Salome closing Mass has already been scheduled for September 26th at 2 PM. The St. Thomas Mass is presently scheduled for November 14th, but as we know, a challenge to the Vatican is undoubtedly going to come from the Save STA effort. This appeal could take up to a year or longer, depending on the resources of those appealing the decision and the willingness of the Vatican to listen.

The interesting thing about all of this is that no decision has been made by Bishop Clark! There has yet to surface any public decree from the desk of Bishop Matthew Clark with his signature which calls for and provides reasonable justification for the closure of St. Thomas the Apostle or St. Salome. However, here are the priests and the hand-picked lay transition committee effectively making the decision to close churches on their own. I don’t think it takes a rocket scientist to figure out that such an action is a blatant violation of Canon Law. Priests and laypersons possess no authority whatsoever to close a church. Only a bishop may carry out such an action, after careful consultation with his council of priests. Has either occurred?

NO.

1. Bishop Clark has failed to consult the presbyteral council concerning the closure of St. Thomas and St. Salome. His previous consultation with the council concerned the merger of the five Irondequouit parishes into a single parish.

2. Bishop Clark has failed to issue a decree which calls for the closure of St. Thomas and/or St. Salome. A decree is required by Canon Law. You can not “backdoor” close a church by suspending Masses as the Irondequoit Transition Team, headed by Fr. Norm Tanck, is attempting to do. Bishop Clark even stated in his response to the previous appeal that should closure later be necessary, that he would issue a decree which could then be appealed. Where is this decree? The Irondequouit leaders are making decisions about closing Masses before any closure has even been ordered. Who does things like that?

So what needs to happen before STA can even be considered for closure? The bishop will need to meet with the prebysteral council on this matter, he needs to consider their advice (which from what we have heard about the previous meeting, was in favor of keeping STA open), then he needs to issue a decree which the people of St. Thomas can appeal. How can the diocese even think it will get away with closing these churches without permitting an appeal?

Below is the proposed Mass schedule:

WEEKEND MASS SCHEDULE BEGINNING THE WEEKEND OF SEPT 25-26
Saturday: 4:00 PM Christ the King
4:30 PM St. Margaret Mary
5:00 PM St. Cecilia
Sunday: 7:30 AM Christ the King
8:30 AM St. Cecilia
9:00 AM St. Margaret Mary
9:30 AM (Until Nov 14) St. Thomas the Apostle
10:00 AM Christ the King
10:30 AM St. Cecilia
11:00 AM St. Margaret Mary
5:00 PM (To be added on Nov 28) Christ the King


WEEKDAY MASS SCHEDULE BEGINNING SEPT 27:
Monday – Friday: 6:30 (CTK), 8:00 (CTK), 9:00 (St.C), 11:30 (St.MM)
Saturday 8:00 (CTK), 9:30 (St.C)

According to this schedule, St. Margaret Mary and St. Cecilia will both have three weekend Masses, while Christ the King will have FOUR. Is it unreasonable to have this fourth Mass at Christ the King be celebrated at St. Thomas the Apostle? Additionally, Christ the King will continue to have two Masses per weekday. Could not one of these be offered at St. Thomas each day? Why should CTK have 2 daily Masses?

One more time, let’s review the facts concerning St. Thomas the Apostle, and try to determine if their is reasonable justification to close the church:

-STA has a congregation of nearly 500 persons. No parish of comparable size has been closed in the Diocese of Rochester. The next highest number was in the low 300s (Our Lady of Mt. Carmel and Holy Family). The diocese currently has several suburban Monroe County parishes drawing the same or less attendance than St. Thomas. These include Our Lady Queen of Peace, St. Thomas More, Church of the Resurrection, Holy Name of Jesus, and Our Lady of Lourdes. None of these have even been rumored for closure.

-STA is financially stable. Unlike the other three churches slated to remain open in Irondequoit, STA has no debt and even has a significant amount of money in reserve. STA also has perhaps the most valuable property of the IPPG sites. The former school is rented.

-STA has a perpetual adoration chapel on campus.

-STA has adequate parking.

-STA has the largest church building in Irondequoit, and perhaps even the diocese. This church is appropriate for  “fewer, larger” churches.

-STA requires no capital expenditures such as renovations or additions. St. Cecilia will require expansion.

-STA contains the buried remains of Msgr. Burns within feet of the church building.

-STA has a shrine in honor of the unborn.

-STA is the only parish in the entire diocese to utilize an altar rail for a Novus Ordo Mass.

-STA’s attendance has stabilized over the past year, while St. Margaret Mary’s continues to plummet.

-The diocese and the pastor have done little to strengthen STA or St. Salome. The diocese discouraged St. George Lithuanian from selecting STA as its new worship site. The pastor has been abrasive toward the people of STA (driving many away), and has gone to great lengths to avoid celebrating Mass there. For a couple months this year, he did not make a single appearance for Mass (according to parishioners). Fr. Tanck is also reported to have deprived the people of the Sacrament of Confession once in pettiness.  His bulletin articles have been condescending, including the one where he calls his parishioners “negative, vehement, and organized” (August 23rd, 2009 bulletin). Let’s not forget his appearance in a CBS/Fox piece with a local Sikh reporter that portrayed the good people of St. Thomas as insensitive. The people have received poor pastoral care from their “pastor.”

This whole thing is corrupt. I do not wish any particular success to Fr. Tanck and co. with this new Irondequoit parish. This parish might as well be called Christ the King, because once again, that’s where the pastor’s loyalties will lie. To borrow a quote from Rush Limbaugh, “I hope he fails.”

My prayers for the people of St. Thomas and St. Salome. You have all been treated like dirt by your pastor and the diocese. This is not right, and I wish you the best in your appeal (provided you even get the chance to make one). This reckless endangerment of souls that the diocese is engaged in needs to stop. The political games against the traditional Catholics of St. Thomas is deplorable.

If any of our readers wish to make a contribution to the Save STA effort, you can send money to:

STABA
P.O. Box 17664
Rochester, NY   14617
I imagine that they will protect your anonymity if you so desire. Remember to pray, pray, pray. Not only for the people of STA, who desperately need assistance, but that this scary diocesan trend is quickly put to a stop.

Gather Them In – the St. Thomas Situation

August 30th, 2010, Promulgated by Gen

We have received the new schedule for Masses in the Irondequoit cluster. The last Sunday Mass at St. Thomas the Apostle is scheduled for November 14th, 2010.

Here are some of the pieces mentioned by Fr. Tanck in the announcement.

  • The last Sunday Mass at St. Salome will be celebrated on Sunday, September 26, at 2:00 PM followed by a reception at the church.  A group at St. Salome has been working on preparing that liturgy and reception.
  • The last Sunday Mass at St. Thomas the Apostle and social reception will be on Sunday, November 14.  A committee at St. Thomas will be established to work on preparing for that day.  Until November 14 there will be a 9:30 AM Sunday Mass at St. Thomas.
  • A 5:00 PM Sunday Mass, at Christ the King will be added to the regular schedule of weekend Sunday Masses on the First Sunday of Advent, November 28.  It is hoped that this Mass would become a special community Mass followed by such things as youth group meetings, young adult gatherings and pot luck dinners.

I think they’re hoping that if they shove cookies at the undernourished souls of St. Thomas and St. Salome everyone will be peachy-keen about the changes. Well, that’s just stupid. Do the folks on the PTT (Parish Transition Team) really think that people are going to go to the new Mass(es) at different worship sites, just because they’re being given community-friendly Mass? I thought the new parish was supposed to “incorporate” the worship styles of each community – where’s the Mass with the communion rail? Will there be one neume of Gregorian Chant? We know the answers to these questions. And so does Fr. Tanck. A pastor is a shepherd of his flock, one who is entrusted with their spiritual well-being. Where’s the comfort for the parishioners of St. Thomas and St. Salome? Is it in the heart of Fr. Tanck, or in the hearts of those who spend their nights on their knees before the Blessed Sacrament in St. Thomas’ adoration chapel?

I can’t say that I’m surprised by the bluntness and lack-lustre “charity” of the announcement. You know, one of the most frustrating things about the whole situation is that the people say “no” and their own priests, with one obvious exception, say “no” too. The priest council debated the point, and there were several priests voicing their praises of St. Thomas. But, alas, they’re closing. Does the Bishop not care that reality is in favor of keeping St. Thomas open? St. Margaret Mary’s received the kiss of death from Nancy DeRycke. St. Cecilia’s is dying off very quickly. Christ the King is stable, but has a reputation for heterodox teaching and liturgy. St. Thomas was perfectly stable before the IPPG got their grubby paws on it, pushing her into a marriage she didn’t want.

The best metaphor I could really conceive on the spur of the moment was the following scene from the Patriot. The people of St. Thomas are sticking together, like the colonists. Like the colonists, the parishioners wanted to trust their leadership, but received nothing but condescension and spiteful words and actions. When they tried to deal with the British military/IPPG and the British commanders/Bishop Clark, Fr. Tanck, all they received was hostility. Now, when they’re confronted with their moment of truth, their choice to yield or resist, the people of St. Thomas must stay together, at all costs, to fight off the wolves who are tightening their circle around them. While the patriots in the film were burned to death by British brutality, I pray that the people of St. Thomas endure through the smoke which is rising around about them. After all, we’re the ones with “Fire” on our side. All they have are pushy nuns, folk hymnals, bongo drums, and felt banners. Not an impressive arsenal, that.

It has been said that the Church is nourished by the blood of the martyrs. I’d like to remind all of us that this blood isn’t just the literal scarlet flood, but the spiritual anguish of our own hearts. The people of so many parishes and schools in the DoR have been oppressed, wounded, and suffered grievous transgressions. Look around you, and you see the monuments to Rochester’s suffering. Our orthodox parishes are targeted for no other reason but for humble obedience. Just as St. Anne was immolated upon the altar of feminism, so too may St. Thomas be grilled over the coals of progressivism’s scheming. Anyone who has the gall to love Tradition in Rochester walks around with a target on his or her heart, just begging to be pierced by the Bishop’s rancorous lance. Let’s not disappoint, shall we? Wear your target with pride, and when your soul is pierced, find joy in knowing that just as you suffer, so too did Our Lord suffer. Couple your sorrows and your anguish to his. In doing this, there can be no defeat, no lasting bitterness. It is a joyful thing to be able to suffer for the Church, and at the hands of the Church’s own shepherds. It is a purifying pain which, when held and examined yields the fruits of Christian charity. Bear all things patiently, with longsuffering, and do not cease to pray. Your ordeal isn’t just your own, but Our Lord’s as well. And let me tell you, friends, He will not permit Himself to be offended forever.

We are praying for you,  just as you have prayed for us.

St. Mary’s, Canandaigua

August 30th, 2010, Promulgated by Bernie

St. Mary's Parish, Canandaigua, NY

In response to my request for nominations of good –or bad- liturgical art in the Diocese of Rochester, a reader sent along a link to a photograph of St. Mary’s Church in Canandaigua. It certainly is a stunning chancel.

The photograph is by Father Matthew Green.

9/11 Mass at the Cathedral

August 30th, 2010, Promulgated by Dr. K

On September 11th, Bishop Matthew Clark will be the celebrant at Sacred Heart Cathedral, offering a Mass in remembrance of those who lost their lives in the September 11th, 2001 terrorist attacks. The Mass will take place at 4 PM on that day. All are welcome to attend and pray for those who lost their lives in the attack.

How Ironic

August 30th, 2010, Promulgated by Dr. K

Today the weekly Catholic Courier e-edition arrived in my inbox. As is normally the case, the e-mail featured approximately five news briefs with a little photograph next to each one. Below is a screenshot of a news brief concerning the revised English translation of the Roman Missal:

Courier capsule

Does anybody else find it interesting that the Courier chose to display an image of St. Mary downtown, a parish that barely follows the current translation of the Roman Missal?  St. Mary downtown, the parish that features inclusive language throughout the liturgy, use of the Apostle’s Creed instead of the Nicene, lay homilies, liturgical dance, laypeople standing around the altar during the consecration, and an assortment of other abuses not called for by the Missal. I mean, if there’s one image of a parish to display for this news story, isn’t St. Mary downtown the last one you would pick?

Weekday Morning Masses Suspended at St. Margaret Mary’s

August 29th, 2010, Promulgated by Gen

The following is taken from St. Margaret Mary’s “The Monitor” -

Important Notice
FYI The 8:30 morning Mass has been discontinued at St.
Margaret Mary’s. Early morning masses are celebrated at
Christ the King @ 6:30 & 8:00 AM M-F, Sat: 8 AM; at
St. Cecilia’s @ 9:00 AM, Sat: 9:30 AM; at St. Thomas the
Apostle’s @ 8:00 AM M-S. Watch for further updates.

I really don’t know what to think about this. SMM will still have a mid-day Mass at 11:30 AM, but still . . . to strip one of the Irondequoit worship sites of half of their Daily Masses and point to St. Thomas as a replacement . . . there’s something going on here. If the IPPG proposal, i.e. “close St. Salome and St. Thomas,” is to be accepted by the Bishop, isn’t it a tad irresponsible to direct the faithful to a parish which, in theory, won’t be around for very long? It’s amazing how the entire situation in Irondequoit is cloudy and uncertain, with one priest contradicting another, the Bishop distancing himself from the problem, and the people simply wanting answers but getting questions instead. Our prayers are with all those involved in the consolidation process in Irondequoit, especially those who are beginning to taste the bitter fruits of a lack of priestly vocations.

It’s In the Mail

August 29th, 2010, Promulgated by Dr. K

It was confirmed at this weekend’s Masses in the IPPG parish that the newly merged community will be named after Blessed (not “Saint”, so don’t say “saint”) Kateri Tekakithwa. Cleansing Fire reported on this a couple days ago.

Also announced at Masses in Irondequoit is that a new schedule has been developed and approved for the parish. Rather than announce the schedule at Masses or include it in the parish bulletin, it will be mailed to each parishioner. Thus, we do not yet have a copy of the schedule in our hands. I hope that one of our readers from the IPPG parishes will send us a copy as soon as the letter arrives. One can not expect good things for St. Thomas or St. Salome when they weren’t even included on the survey asking parishioners what church they would like to attend:

Flawed IPPG survey

To the IPPG priests: St. Thomas the Apostle and St. Salome are not closed. Bishop Clark has never decreed their closure. If you fail to include these two churches of some 800 people into the new Mass schedule, you will have committed a pastorally irresponsible act against 800 souls.  Show some compassion. Both of these churches should have at least one Sunday obligation Mass per week, and preferably not scheduled at 4:30 in the morning.

Beware folks, as we said before, the diocese is going to try to backdoor close St. Thomas and St. Salome. Cutting weekend Mass offerings will be the first action taken in this process.

Communion Antiphons > “One Bread, One Body”

August 28th, 2010, Promulgated by Gen

A diligent and devoted reader of Cleansing Fire emails us the following snippet of glorious news:

“This evening’s Mass at Our Lady of Victory was among the best I have ever had the pleasure of being present for. To start with, the altar (i.e. “old High Altar”) and the Cranmer table were both decked out with regal simplicity, with green altar linens, simple lace linens, and perfectly symmetrical candles. That’s a big thing with me, having a symmetrical sanctuary, but that’s beside the point. The second dose of awesomeness was the fact that Deacon Scott Caton was the homilist for the Mass – and what a homily he gave! Talk about defending the Truth with “clarity and charity”! His reverence, coupled with Fr. Antinarelli’s customary liturgical decorum, was tops. Had I your tremendous and umlimited authority, I would confer upon the whole lot a “nod of the miter.”

But that’s not even the best part. At Communion, my ears were greeted, not with a Eucharistic hymn, per se, but something absolutely transcendent. It was today’s Communion antiphon, chanted in Latin, with an English verse. Now that’s “mutual enrichment.” The cantor’s love for the ancient musical traditions of the Church was undeniable. I commend him on it. For anyone not familiar with this weekend’s proper communion antiphon, it can be found here (in English).

Our Lady of Victory is the best parish in the diocese when it comes to enacting what Vatican II intended. Rather than tacky hymns glorifying the created, there is a sense of awe at the contemplation of the Creator. The use of Latin is just so that it enriches the soul without seeming heavy-handed or politically-motivated. There’s no sense of hesitancy, impropriety, indecency, confusion, disorder, or division. All those present do the same thing, say the same words, believe the same thing. Absolutely tremendous. I hope that this introduction of some of the Gregorian propers of the Mass will continue and grow in time. Fr. Antinarelli deserves to be commended by all for his untarnished fidelity to the liturgy and the Church which is its guardian. The seeds have been planted, and I look forward to seeing them burst into bloom.”

I yield to our brother’s request – an official Nod of the Miter goes to Fr. Antinarelli, David O’Donnell, the parishioners at Our Lady of Victory, and anyone who has the audacity to prove their literacy by doing what the documents of Vatican II actually say.

On the NYC Mosque

August 28th, 2010, Promulgated by Gen

I found this masterful article on the National Review’s website. It’s definitely worth a read:

Location, location, location.

So far, the Ground Zero mosque controversy has focused excessively on its proximity to the scene of the September 11 massacre. The Park51 Islamic center would stand 560 feet from that revered site. Would moving it 5,600 feet away calm this storm?

Perhaps, but far more important is what would happen inside this mosque. That ought to determine if it should be even closer to Ground Zero, or if it even should open anywhere in America.

Imagine if the mosque’s imam said this:

Our mosque will be the world headquarters of a new Islam that is at peace with the 21st century and that strives to do for Islam what Martin Luther did for Christianity in 1517. That’s when he nailed his 95 Theses to the door of Wittenberg, Germany’s Castle Church, launched the Protestant Reformation, and helped Catholicism correct its excesses.

We will pray every day to save the 2,752 innocent souls slaughtered at the World Trade Center in the name of a militant Islam that we wholeheartedly reject and endeavor to overcome.

We will pray every day to condemn the souls of September 11’s 19 evil perpetrators. May they roast in Hell forever, each morning hotter than the last.

We will pray every day for the rapid defeat of al-Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, and other violent, Islamic-extremist terrorist groups.

We will pray every day for Islam to be a faith equal — but not superior — to other religions that people freely may choose to practice.

We will pray every day for the freedom, equality, and longevity of every human being — regardless of belief, gender, or sexuality.

We invite Jews, Christians, non-believers, and everyone else to join our efforts. And we humbly ask to pursue them adjacent to where radical Islam committed its greatest modern atrocity. May the light of our example drive the darkness from that day.

If this mosque’s imam preached these sentiments, many — and perhaps most — Americans would agree that his antidote to al-Qaeda’s poison could stand 56 feet from the scene of its most heinous crime. Instead, doubts grow about the moderation of Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf’s voice. It seems more likely that the words above would leave him tongue-tied.

• Just 19 days after September 11 — while Ground Zero still was a flaming, smoking ruin — Rauf told CBS’s 60 Minutes: “I wouldn’t say that the United States deserved what happened, but the United States’ policies were an accessory to the crime that happened.”

• Rauf said in 2005 that “the United States has more Muslim blood on its hands than al-Qaeda has on its hands of innocent non-Muslims.” Never mind the millions of Muslims whom America has liberated, or at least tried to rescue from tyranny, in Afghanistan, Bosnia, Iraq, Lebanon, and Somalia. America assisted millions more Muslims after the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami and is aiding Muslims today in flood-ravaged Pakistan.

• Rauf has repeatedly refused to identify Hamas as a terrorist group.

• Most worrisome, Rauf embraces sharia, the fundamentalist Islamic law responsible for too much of Earth’s totalitarian barbarism. “What Muslims want is to ensure that their secular laws are not in conflict with the Quran or the Hadith, the sayings of Muhammad,” Rauf wrote in an April 24, 2009, Huffington Post essay titled “What Sharia Law Is All About.” Rauf added: “What Muslims want is a judiciary that ensures that the laws are not in conflict with the Quran and the Hadith.” He also has written that he wants to give “religious communities more leeway to judge among themselves, according to their laws.” Sharia relies on the Koran, Hadith, and other Islamic texts to punish offenders, too often with sentences that stink of the 7th century A.D.

• A Saudi sharia court is seeking a hospital to enforce its penalty against an unidentified man who paralyzed Abdulaziz al-Mutairi, 22, in an assault with a meat cleaver. Under sharia’s “eye for an eye” principal, Judge Saoud bin Suleiman al-Youssef wants to paralyze the attacker by severing his spinal cord. To their credit, Saudi doctors so far have refused to cooperate in this carnage.

• Under Iran’s Islamic law, the Guardian reports, twelve women and three men face death by stoning for adultery. After international criticism, Iranian jurists recently announced that several of these individuals instead would be hanged.

• Since Muslims implemented sharia in northern Nigeria in 2000, at least twelve people have received death sentences for homosexuality and adultery. Most of these, however, have been commuted to mere jail time.

• Since January, women in West Aceh, Indonesia, must wear long skirts rather than jeans or trousers. Police enforce this rule, sometimes by cutting the pants that women are caught wearing. “It’s my obligation as a leader to help the people so they won’t suffer in the afterlife,” West Aceh regent Ramli Mansur said in August 18’s Jakarta Globe. “Besides, when women don’t dress according to sharia law, they’re asking to get raped.”

• Once a Muslim, always a Muslim, according to sharia. “Muslim jurists are unanimous that apostates must be punished,” the Muslim Brotherhood’s influential spiritual leader, Sheik Sheik Yusuf al-Qaradawi, declared about Islamic converts to other faiths. The Qatari said these “apostates must be executed.”

• Even snacking can be deadly under sharia. In November 2004, a 13-year-old Iranian boy violated the Ramadan fast. He received 85 lashes, which killed him.

Does Imam Rauf embrace such brutality? Who knows? But the fact that he wants the U.S. to be “sharia compliant” rather than sharia-free should worry every liberty-loving American.

While America battles militant Islam, should a pro-sharia mosque be allowed on our soil? The First Amendment may permit sharia advocacy, much as counseling Marxism-Leninism remained legal even as Americans shivered through the Cold War. Nevertheless, there is no excuse for leaders like Gotham mayor Michael Bloomberg and President Obama (before his spectacular flip-flop) to applaud a mosque that would enshrine the grotesque and deadly doctrine of sharia. Even 5,600 miles away, such a facility would not be far enough from Ground Zero.

—- New York commentator Deroy Murdock is a columnist with the Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow with the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford University.

Be Not Afraid

August 27th, 2010, Promulgated by Nerina

This is probably the most often associated Scripture passage with our late Holy Father John Paul II.  I know it has brought me comfort many times and it defined so much of his papacy.

I found this lengthy, but fascinating article about JPII’s contribution in changing the political world during his pontificate over at InsideCatholic.com.  The author, Robert Reilly, goes to great lengths to develop a fuller picture of the influences upon the pope and explain why he so often appeared as a political contradiction.  He personally opposed the death penalty but never said that capital punishment went against Church doctrine.  He refused to visit South Africa during the reign of apartheid, but went to Cuba where Christmas celebrations are prohibited.  He applauded the U.S. for it’s efforts in WWII, but warned about “totalitarian” democracy.  In short, our late Holy Father “was not a politician,” Mr. Reilly writes, but a “metaphysician and more.”

My favorite paragraph:

What, finally, enabled this man to do what he did? No conventional explanation suffices. There is an illustrative episode from his last months that hints at an answer. This was, recall, a period when the focus was on the pope’s suffering and when, one would think, he would be consumed by it. One of his closest senior aides was looking for the pope in his apartments. Not finding him, he went into the private chapel. There he found the pope in his altar chair, with his arms around the tabernacle, singing in Polish. The aide fled. Later in the afternoon, he asked John Paul II what he had been doing in the chapel. The pope responded that he had been singing a song his mother used to sing to him when he was sad as a boy, and that he had been comforting our Lord.

I know that some people have mixed emotions about this man.  They wonder how he could not have known the magnitude of the abuse scandals.  They wonder how corruption could go uncorrected under his watch.  I certainly have no answers, but I know he was the instrument of so much good.   I beg his intercession for the Church.  John Paul II, pray for us.

Diocesan Politics

August 27th, 2010, Promulgated by Dr. K

I was browsing through the bulletin of the St. Thomas More/Our Lady Queen of Peace cluster when I noticed something that has managed to escape my eye until now. First, let me preface what I am about to say by reminding our readers that these parishes are not the most well-attended in the diocese. Both of these Brighton churches average between 450-525 people per weekend (side note: St. Thomas More’s attendance has plummeted by over 300 people in just a couple years since a laywoman, Margaret Ostromecki, was installed as pastoral administrator). If you doubt what I say, below are the attendance figures from this past weekend.

Anyway, what caught my eye was the rather high number of Masses offered at these two parishes. While communities such as Peace of Christ, the Gates-Chili cluster, and others with three church sites have to split six Masses among three churches (in a 2-2-2 arrangement), this cluster has the luxury of seven Masses divided among just two parishes. Rather strange if you ask me, especially when one takes into account that their attendance totals are significantly less than the numbers in any of the Gates-Chili cluster parishes.

Below are the weekend Masses offered at the two parishes:

Our Lady Queen of Peace Masses

St. Thomas More Masses

I want you to focus specifically on the number of Masses offered at OLQP. This parish, which as I said earlier averages 450-525 people each week, has the privilege of four weekend Masses. That’s a bit much with the current priest shortage we have in Rochester, don’t you think? OLQP is averaging approximately 100 people per Mass, or using around 33% of its worship capacity. Hardly a good use of facilities, hardly a “vibrant” community, and hardly worth the inappropriate distribution of Mass offerings. How come St. Thomas the Apostle in Irondequoit, which has roughly the same attendance figures as OLQP and STM, is about to be stripped of all its weekend Masses and shut down, while OLQP gets to chug along on its merry way with four weekend Masses? The answer, my friends, is diocesan politics.

As you may or may not know, Fr. Joseph Hart, STD, one of Bishop Clark’s two hand selected Vicars General for the diocese, is the “sacramental minister” of Our Lady Queen of Peace and now St. Thomas More. Fr. Hart is basically the #2 man in the Diocese of Rochester. He has A LOT of pull with Bishop Clark, let me assure you of that. Thus, because OLQP is his little pet parish, this church is in no danger of closure, and Fr. Hart appears  able to remain there in perpetuity since he is no longer the pastor, and thus no longer bound to Bishop Clark’s maximum of 12 years in any one parish for a pastoral leader.

St. Thomas the Apostle, on the other hand, enjoys no such luxury of having a Vicar General of the diocese on staff. STA doesn’t even have a real pastor, but rather has been assigned to the pastoral care (“care” not the word I would use for what they have received) of the Christ the King pastor, Fr. Norm Tanck CSB. When it came time to consolidate the five Irondequout parishes into one large parish, this priest was nowhere to be found with respect to the defense of St. Thomas and St. Salome, because his loyalties were elsewhere.

Isn’t that really the difference between St. Thomas and OLQP/STM? The cluster of  OLQP/STM has a diocesan big tuna on staff, while St. Thomas has a pastor of another parish in charge who wants to be rid of this burden placed upon him. Diocesan politics are very much at play in keeping certain churches open (St. Mary downtown, Resurrection, OLQP/STM, Our Lady of Lourdes/St. Anne) while others have to shut down because of this so-called priest shortage.

A Name Is Chosen

August 27th, 2010, Promulgated by Dr. K

A person “in the know” regarding IPPG (Irondequoit Pastoral Planning Group) news has informed us that Bishop Clark has selected Blessed Kateri Tekakithwa to be the name for the new merged parish.

Certainly a good choice considering that the other options included “Good Samaritan” and “Incarnate Word”.

St. Pius X – Not a Fan of Folk Music

August 27th, 2010, Promulgated by Gen

But, alas, we care all too much about how we feel rather than how the Church universal feels. Of course, by “we” I mean the Rabjohn, DeRycke & Co. management of St. Pius X Church in the Diocese of Rochester. Before I present some pieces of evidence before your eyes, let’s look at Pope Pius X’s motu proprio on sacred music, Tra le Sollecitudini. He states:

I General principles
1. Sacred music, being a complementary part of the solemn liturgy, participates in the general scope of the liturgy, which is the glory of God and the sanctification and edification of the faithful (Folk and rock music are not sanctifying. Period.). It contributes to the decorum and the splendor of the ecclesiastical ceremonies (Decorum and splendor – two things Bishop Clark put in his Cuisinart to make his Progressive Puree), and since its principal office is to clothe with suitable melody the liturgical text proposed for the understanding of the faithful, its proper aim is to add greater efficacy to the text, in order that through it the faithful may be the more easily moved to devotion and better disposed for the reception of the fruits of grace belonging to the celebration of the most holy mysteries.

2. Sacred music should consequently possess, in the highest degree, the qualities proper to the liturgy, and in particular sanctity and goodness of form, which will spontaneously produce the final quality of universality (read “uniformity”).

It must be holy, and must, therefore, exclude all profanity not only in itself, but in the manner in which it is presented by those who execute it. (Rock music is not, in and of itself, “holy.” It may be pleasing, but it is secular, aka “profane,” something “outside of the sanctuary.” It’s in the definition, folks. You show me a piece of rock music or a folk melody which lifts the soul more than the Pange Lingua, and I’ll concede the point.)

It must be true art, for otherwise it will be impossible for it to exercise on the minds of those who listen to it that efficacy which the Church aims at obtaining in admitting into her liturgy the art of musical sounds.

But it must, at the same time, be universal in the sense that while every nation is permitted to admit into its ecclesiastical compositions those special forms which may be said to constitute its native music, still these forms must be subordinated in such a manner to the general characteristics of sacred music that nobody of any nation may receive an impression other than good on hearing them.

II. The different kinds of sacred music
3. These qualities are to be found, in the highest degree, in Gregorian Chant, which is, consequently the Chant proper to the Roman Church, the only chant she has inherited from the ancient fathers, which she has jealously guarded for centuries in her liturgical codices, which she directly proposes to the faithful as her own, which she prescribes exclusively for some parts of the liturgy, and which the most recent studies have so happily restored to their integrity and purity. (Oh, so not folk music twanging forth from pathetically-tuned guitars and banjos? Gee . . . who could have geussed?)

On these grounds Gregorian Chant has always been regarded as the supreme model for sacred music, so that it is fully legitimate to lay down the following rule: the more closely a composition for church approaches in its movement, inspiration and savor the Gregorian form, the more sacred and liturgical it becomes; and the more out of harmony it is with that supreme model, the less worthy it is of the temple. (Folks, when a Pope says, “this is the rule,” you better pay attention.)

The ancient traditional Gregorian Chant must, therefore, in a large measure be restored to the functions of public worship, and the fact must be accepted by all that an ecclesiastical function loses none of its solemnity when accompanied by this music alone.

Special efforts are to be made to restore the use of the Gregorian Chant by the people, so that the faithful may again take a more active part in the ecclesiastical offices, as was the case in ancient times. (The words “active participation of the laity” come surging to the forefront of my mind.)

4. The above-mentioned qualities are also possessed in an excellent degree by Classic Polyphony, especially of the Roman School, which reached its greatest perfection in the sixteenth century, owing to the works of Pierluigi da Palestrina, and continued subsequently to produce compositions of excellent quality from a liturgical and musical standpoint. Classic Polyphony agrees admirably with Gregorian Chant, the supreme model of all sacred music, and hence it has been found worthy of a place side by side with Gregorian Chant, in the more solemn functions of the Church, such as those of the Pontifical Chapel. This, too, must therefore be restored largely in ecclesiastical functions, especially in the more important basilicas, in cathedrals, and in the churches and chapels of seminaries and other ecclesiastical institutions in which the necessary means are usually not lacking.

5. The Church has always recognized and favored the progress of the arts, admitting to the service of religion everything good and beautiful discovered by genius in the course of ages — always, however, with due regard to the liturgical laws (The laws aren’t there to be broken. The rules weren’t superseded by Vatican II. They were supposed to be bolstered, but look how people twisted the words of Sacrosanctum Concillium.). Consequently modern music is also admitted to the Church, since it, too, furnishes compositions of such excellence, sobriety and gravity, that they are in no way unworthy of the liturgical functions.

Still, since modern music has risen mainly to serve profane uses, greater care must be taken with regard to it, in order that the musical compositions of modern style which are admitted in the Church may contain nothing profane, be free from reminiscences of motifs adopted in the theaters, and be not fashioned even in their external forms after the manner of profane pieces.

6. Among the different kinds of modern music, that which appears less suitable for accompanying the functions of public worship is the theatrical style, which was in the greatest vogue, especially in Italy, during the last century. This of its very nature is diametrically opposed to Gregorian Chant and classic polyphony, and therefore to the most important law of all good sacred music. Besides the intrinsic structure, the rhythm and what is known as the conventionalism of this style adapt themselves but badly to the requirements of true liturgical music.

I am sure that some people reading this are of the “but folk/rock/jazz/hip hop music in the liturgy is okey-dokey.” Show me one document that says that explicitly. The Church explicitly promotes Gregorian Chant and Sacred Polyphony, but nowhere does it explicitly approve and endorse the use of music thoroughly rooted in secular life. Nowhere. Show me the document.

But, now we must turn our gaze from the uniform orthodoxy of Pope Pius X (and Pope Benedict XVI) and gaze on the hideously disfigured face of the music program at St. Pius X parish. The following is from the upcoming bulletin:

One of the funny things about the Catholic Church is that it is aptly named. It is “catholic” – universal. How is universality better demonstrated than each parish doing its own thing? That’s not universality, friends, it’s stupidity. It’s fundamentally Protestant in its mentality. “I want to do this, so I’ll do it. If you want to do that, fine . . . go ahead and do it.” That’s pathetic. Since when was the Liturgy something we could tinker freely with? It is so far beyond us that to even think that we have “mastered” it is a demonstration of the sin of pride, tempered of course, by profound ignorance. You cannot change the Liturgy any more than you can change the course of a hurricane. It’s ever-ancient, ever-new, not ever-changing, ever-you. The Church declares Gregorian Chant to have principal place in the liturgy. I say this way too much, but it’s true. How come our administrators, even those who aren’t overtly heretical, choose to overlook such a simple thing? I’m not suggesting that every parish could realistically switch to a Gregorian Mass overnight. That’s not realistic. However, you can take steps.

Like this:

Sutherland’s “Crucifixion” – Good Liturgical Art?

August 27th, 2010, Promulgated by Bernie

"The Crucifixion" by Graham Sutherland, 1946*

Which subjects are appropriate for chancel images?

That’s an interesting question to me. (I hope it’s also an interesting question for you!) It’s an easier question to answer for Eastern Rite Catholics and Orthodox than it is for us. Our Western tradition has not developed as clear a focus as to appropriate subjects and styles. Controversy swirled around many liturgical works unveiled in the Church’s past. But addressing the question helps us to think about our faith and the liturgical art that is meant to help communicate it. And so, it’s interesting to put before you -the readers- examples to get your reactions.

The previous example (The Great Banquet) elicited a little hesitation (except for Gen). I personally don’t think it passes muster but I’m unable to settle on reasons why. I keep going back and forth on it in a “Yes, but…” conversation with myself.

Anyway, here is another work for you to consider: Graham Sutherland’s The Crucifixion which he completed in 1946. Sutherland converted to Catholicism in 1926 and was deeply religious until his death in 1980. He worked as a war artist during the Second World War depicting mining, industry, and bomb damage.

Sutherland painted numerous crucifixion scenes. This one hangs in the south transept of St. Matthew’s Anglican Church, Northampton, England. Many of you may already be familiar with it or with several other versions of its composition.

I won’t go into any analysis or description of the painting for fear I may prejudice your reactions.

In your opinion is this an appropriate liturgical work of art for display in the chancel over the altar in a Catholic church? Would it contribute to, and complement, the Liturgy in an appropriately meaningful way? Does it reinforce Catholic doctrine? Why or why not?

A REQUEST: Can you recommend a liturgical work of art from one of our Diocese of Rochester churches that you think is particularly good –or bad? Let’s limit your nominations to paintings, sculptures, mosaics, or windows. Send me a brief description (or picture, if you have one) and information on its location. Your identity will not be revealed. Send me an email: bernie@cleansingfiredor.com. You can nominate in the Comment Box if you wish.

*Picture Source

Harvard Valedictorian Joins Convent

August 26th, 2010, Promulgated by Nate

Remember those Dominican Sisters who were on Oprah?

http://cleansingfiredor.com/2010/02/dominican-sisters-on-oprah/

Well they have some very exciting news to announce, the valedictorian of Harvard University is joining their convent. The Dominican Sisters of Mary, Mother of the Eucharist in Ann Arbor, Michigan are welcoming Mary Anne Marks, Harvard Valedictorian, to their ranks. http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/harvard-valedictorian-discusses-her-dominican-vocation/

Mary Anne is quite a remarkable woman. She graduated with degrees in Classics and English, and gave her Valedictory address in Latin: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYewkFKPPhs

The National Review interviewed her recently, and I would recommend all to read it. http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/244665/god-and-woman-harvard-interview?page=1

Combox Warfare

August 25th, 2010, Promulgated by Nerina

Given my recent exchange with “Curmudgeon” (found here), I got to thinking about  the limitations of blogging as a medium for effective communication (and dare I say it, engaging in “dialogue”).  My husband thinks no sane person should enter into combox discussions because people say things that they would never say to a person if they were “face to face.”  After my bruising discussion with “Curmudgeon,” I’m inclined to agree.

However, I’m not willing to give up just yet.  I do think  that each of us need to continually think about how we try to convey our thoughts and opinions and ask  if we are doing so with true charity.  Let me say it again, TRUE charity.  Not just some poor excuse like “I feel I have been charitable in taking time to respond.” In my opinion, and it’s only opinion, that’s a pretty sad standard.  I think of  1 Peter 3:15-16:

Always be ready to give an explanation to anyone who asks your for a reason for your hope, but do it with gentleness and reverence keeping your conscience clear, so that, when you are maligned, those who defame your good conduct in Christ may themselves be put to shame.

In the discussion about Catholic schools, I asked what I thought was a straightforward question.  I stated that I had concerns about Catholic schools  since some of the stories I hear from parents with children in these schools is troubling.  Mike, in the spirit of my question which said, “Perhaps those with more intimate knowledge could elaborate” offered his experience.  With charity and honesty.  Curmudgeon, however, chose to attack.  I won’t rehash everything he said, but his opening salvo was enough to prompt rebukes from both Mike and Ben (for which I am grateful).  It’s hard to find “gentleness and reverence” in the following:

Perhaps you ought to learn about a subject before purporting to know anything about said subject. You condemn the show Friday Night Lights for glorifying abortion, (which it did not do)[ as an aside, this is NOT what I said], but put your children in an educational system that teaches, preaches and glorifies pre-marital sex, contraceptives and abortion through their sex ed programs.

Or in this:

It seems you speak before knowing or learning facts, and as such often overstate or know little to nothing of which you speak. Do not rejoice in your ignorance – learn something, please.

Ouch.  Believe me, it is no fun to review these comments because they hurt.  “Curmudgeon” may think they hurt because they are true.  That’s not it, though.  They hurt because they are hurtful. They demean and berate.  They are anything but gentle and kind.  “Curmudgeon” even later admitted that he could have been “more diplomatic.”

Clearly, “Curmudgeon” is sensitive about one Catholic school in particular – St. John Bosco. For the record, I have heard good things about SJB.  All the parents I talk to with children in the school are happy.  My only questions had to do with teacher qualifications and curriculum.  As I pointed out to “Curmudgeon” he could have been an ambassador for this school he feels so strongly about, but instead he chose to say this:

You doubt SJBS in particular and Catholic education in general. You admit to speaking without fact or context. You send your children to public school and feel fit to tear down authentic Catholic education.

And this:

…yet I will not be charitable to those who feel fit to critique those who are tying to make authentic Catholic education viable in this Diocese. As for verbal abuse – if you can’t stand the heat, don’t pontificate without facts, even in trivial matters.

“Curmudgeon” may still find everything he said acceptable.  Obviously, I disagree.  Again, for the record, I did not tear down Catholic education.  Not once.  I wish it were more vibrant in our diocese and that every family with the desire to send their children could afford to do so.  I sincerely hope that SJB proves to be the success that so many people desire it to be.  It’s success would be a great witness in our diocese.

Finally, I think we are all capable of saying rude and nasty things in comment threads.  If we try to imagine that we are sitting in that person’s living room in an actual conversation, we might be able to keep our emotions in check.  It is something I am going to try to remember more often.  I’ll leave us all Paul’s exhortation  in 1 Corinthians 13:1:

If I speak in human and angelic tongues but do not have love, I am a resounding gong or a clashing cymbal.

Heavenly Father, grant me the gift of true charity, desiring the best for my fellow man.  Silence my “clashing cymbal” and inspire my words through Your grace.  I ask this in the precious name of Jesus Christ, Our Lord.

Amen.